Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

准确率问题 #6

Open
dinghan007 opened this issue Dec 3, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

准确率问题 #6

dinghan007 opened this issue Dec 3, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@dinghan007
Copy link

您好,我用您的代码跑了这几个数据集,发现实现结果跟Paper上的低了1%或者2%。请问是什么问题?感谢回复

@prasys
Copy link

prasys commented Dec 4, 2019

你好!

我们觉得z喝个是‘normal。这个script 没有’fixed random number' (seed value)
对不起,如果我的华语不好

谢谢你

@dinghan007
Copy link
Author

dinghan007 commented Dec 5, 2019 via email

@prasys
Copy link

prasys commented Dec 6, 2019

it's basically because neural network (as you know are non-deterministic) , in the paper or the in code - we do not know the magical number or the seed number. So even if I run the code again , I am getting a slightly different results

So if it's within some % ,. Hope this helps

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants