Replies: 1 comment
-
Good call, @zarlo. Since they did recently update to a split-use licensing structure, "... MIT or a Prism Library Commercial Use License.." during the 9.x version (currently unreleased). Since I currently have Prism.Avalonia set up under the MIT license and we're using a version of Prism.Core under the same (v8.x), it's currently not an issue. However, moving forward into v9., this will need to be updated. I'll reach out to Dan and Brian to cover our bases. Thank you again for bringing this up. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
with prism library license change i think you should make note of it in the read me as people may have to pay for a license to use prism library
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions