Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Resource ID is missing in API Management Logger response #5318

Closed
jhendrixMSFT opened this issue Mar 4, 2019 · 6 comments
Closed

Resource ID is missing in API Management Logger response #5318

jhendrixMSFT opened this issue Mar 4, 2019 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@jhendrixMSFT
Copy link
Member

Ported from Azure/azure-sdk-for-go#4211

According to the response documented here the LoggerContractProperties type should have a resourceId field however it's missing from the swagger.

@solankisamir
Copy link
Member

solankisamir commented Mar 5, 2019

The example is from 2018-06-01-preview version and resourceId is documented in the rest spec here

@jhendrixMSFT
Copy link
Member Author

@solankisamir thanks!
@JunyiYi see package github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/services/preview/apimanagement/mgmt/2018-06-01-preview/apimanagement

@tombuildsstuff
Copy link
Contributor

@jhendrixMSFT unfortunately we're unable to use the 2018-06-01-preview API at this time due to the breaking change in the API; since this exists in the response from the 2018-01-01 API - would it be possible to get this exposed in the Swagger there too?

Thanks!

@jhendrixMSFT
Copy link
Member Author

That would be up to @solankisamir if this functionality is available in that API version.

@solankisamir
Copy link
Member

solankisamir commented Mar 5, 2019

@tombuildsstuff which end to end story is impacted due to missing resourceId property in 2018-01-01 LoggerContract

@tombuildsstuff
Copy link
Contributor

@solankisamir this not being exposed at this time means we're unable to expose the resourceID field in the Terraform resource for API Management Loggers: hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#2994

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants