Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[AVM Module Issue]: SQL Server module adding support for auditingSettings #1825

Closed
1 task done
peterbud opened this issue May 2, 2024 · 12 comments · Fixed by #2073
Closed
1 task done

[AVM Module Issue]: SQL Server module adding support for auditingSettings #1825

peterbud opened this issue May 2, 2024 · 12 comments · Fixed by #2073
Assignees
Labels
Class: Resource Module 📦 This is a resource module Type: AVM 🅰️ ✌️ Ⓜ️ This is an AVM related issue Type: Feature Request ➕ New feature or request

Comments

@peterbud
Copy link
Contributor

peterbud commented May 2, 2024

Check for previous/existing GitHub issues

  • I have checked for previous/existing GitHub issues

Issue Type?

Feature Request

Module Name

avm/res/sql/server

(Optional) Module Version

No response

Description

It would be great to have support for auditingSettings. Proper SQL Server audit settings are now required by many internal compliance scans, so that would be a great addition.

(Optional) Correlation Id

No response

@peterbud peterbud added Needs: Triage 🔍 Maintainers need to triage still Type: AVM 🅰️ ✌️ Ⓜ️ This is an AVM related issue labels May 2, 2024

Important

The "Needs: Triage 🔍" label must be removed once the triage process is complete!

Tip

For additional guidance on how to triage this issue/PR, see the BRM Issue Triage documentation.

Note

This label was added as per ITA06.

Note

The "Type: Feature Request ➕" label was added as per ITA20.

@avm-team-linter avm-team-linter bot added the Class: Resource Module 📦 This is a resource module label May 2, 2024
Copy link

@peterbud, thanks for submitting this issue for the avm/res/sql/server module!

Important

A member of the @Azure/avm-res-sql-server-module-owners-bicep or @Azure/avm-res-sql-server-module-contributors-bicep team will review it soon!

Warning

Tagging the AVM Core Team (@Azure/avm-core-team-technical-bicep) due to a module owner or contributor having not responded to this issue within 3 business days. The AVM Core Team will attempt to contact the module owners/contributors directly.

Tip

  • To prevent further actions to take effect, the "Status: Response Overdue 🚩" label must be removed, once this issue has been responded to.
  • To avoid this rule being (re)triggered, the ""Needs: Triage 🔍" label must be removed as part of the triage process (when the issue is first responded to)!

Note

This message was posted as per ITA01BCP.

@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added the Status: Response Overdue 🚩 When an issue/PR has not been responded to for X amount of days label May 8, 2024
@AlexanderSehr
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @bryansan-msft, please take a look and triage the issue when you have a moment :)

Warning

Tagging the AVM Core Team (@Azure/avm-core-team-technical-bicep) due to a module owner or contributor having not responded to this issue within 3 business days. The AVM Core Team will attempt to contact the module owners/contributors directly.

Tip

  • To prevent further actions to take effect, the "Status: Response Overdue 🚩" label must be removed, once this issue has been responded to.
  • To avoid this rule being (re)triggered, the ""Needs: Triage 🔍" label must be removed as part of the triage process (when the issue is first responded to)!

Note

This message was posted as per ITA01BCP.

Caution

**This issue requires the AVM Core Team's (@Azure/avm-core-team-technical-bicep) immediate attention as it hasn't been responded to within 6 business days. **

Tip

  • To avoid this rule being (re)triggered, the "Needs: Triage 🔍" and "Status: Response Overdue 🚩" labels must be removed when the issue is first responded to!
  • Remove the "Needs: Immediate Attention ‼️" label once the issue has been responded to.

Note

This message was posted as per ITA02BCP.

@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added the Needs: Immediate Attention ‼️ Immediate attention of module owner / AVM team is needed label May 14, 2024

Warning

Tagging the AVM Core Team (@Azure/avm-core-team-technical-bicep) due to a module owner or contributor having not responded to this issue within 3 business days. The AVM Core Team will attempt to contact the module owners/contributors directly.

Tip

  • To prevent further actions to take effect, the "Status: Response Overdue 🚩" label must be removed, once this issue has been responded to.
  • To avoid this rule being (re)triggered, the ""Needs: Triage 🔍" label must be removed as part of the triage process (when the issue is first responded to)!

Note

This message was posted as per ITA01BCP.

Caution

**This issue requires the AVM Core Team's (@Azure/avm-core-team-technical-bicep) immediate attention as it hasn't been responded to within 6 business days. **

Tip

  • To avoid this rule being (re)triggered, the "Needs: Triage 🔍" and "Status: Response Overdue 🚩" labels must be removed when the issue is first responded to!
  • Remove the "Needs: Immediate Attention ‼️" label once the issue has been responded to.

Note

This message was posted as per ITA02BCP.

@peterbud
Copy link
Contributor Author

In case the maintainer is unavailable, should I maybe try to add this feature with a new PR?

@AlexanderSehr
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @peterbud,
openening a PR is always an option. Yet, it's not exactly how this should go. I'll reach out to the maintainer internally too. I think he's back. Sorry for the inconvenience.

@bryansan-msft
Copy link
Contributor

Hello, @peterbud and @AlexanderSehr, if Peter is happy to open a PR I am fine with it as long as we add a test for this new feature. I don't have availability to tackle this immediately so it will take a month or so for me to have a PR.

I don't think this feature is something complicated or critical. They are just a bunch of new options that we can group in a new UDT for these settings.

@bryansan-msft bryansan-msft removed the Needs: Triage 🔍 Maintainers need to triage still label May 20, 2024
@AlexanderSehr AlexanderSehr removed Needs: Immediate Attention ‼️ Immediate attention of module owner / AVM team is needed Status: Response Overdue 🚩 When an issue/PR has not been responded to for X amount of days labels May 20, 2024
bryansan-msft pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 29, 2024
…r' (#2073)

## Description

<!--
>Thank you for your contribution !
> Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed.
> Please also include the context.
> List any dependencies that are required for this change.

-->
Fixes #1825

I have also updated the API versions as they were outdated a bit, and
generated warnings.

## Pipeline Reference

<!-- Insert your Pipeline Status Badge below -->

| Pipeline |
| -------- |
|
[![avm.res.sql.server](https://github.com/peterbud/bicep-registry-modules/actions/workflows/avm.res.sql.server.yml/badge.svg?branch=audit-settings)](https://github.com/peterbud/bicep-registry-modules/actions/workflows/avm.res.sql.server.yml)
|

The pipeline has deployed successfully 5 out of the 7 tests, the `max`
and `waf` timed out at creating the log analytics workspace.

## Type of Change

<!-- Use the check-boxes [x] on the options that are relevant. -->

- [ ] Update to CI Environment or utlities (Non-module effecting
changes)
- [x] Azure Verified Module updates:
- [ ] Bugfix containing backwards compatible bug fixes, and I have NOT
bumped the MAJOR or MINOR version in `version.json`:
- [ ] Someone has opened a bug report issue, and I have included "Closes
#{bug_report_issue_number}" in the PR description.
- [ ] The bug was found by the module author, and no one has opened an
issue to report it yet.
- [x] Feature update backwards compatible feature updates, and I have
bumped the MINOR version in `version.json`.
- [ ] Breaking changes and I have bumped the MAJOR version in
`version.json`.
  - [ ] Update to documentation

## Checklist

- [x] I'm sure there are no other open Pull Requests for the same
update/change
- [x] I have run `Set-AVMModule` locally to generate the supporting
module files.
- [x] My corresponding pipelines / checks run clean and green without
any errors or warnings

<!-- Please keep up to day with the contribution guide at
https://aka.ms/avm/contribute/bicep -->
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Class: Resource Module 📦 This is a resource module Type: AVM 🅰️ ✌️ Ⓜ️ This is an AVM related issue Type: Feature Request ➕ New feature or request
Projects
3 participants