Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dynamic mpd support by client #371

Open
irajs opened this issue Aug 9, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Dynamic mpd support by client #371

irajs opened this issue Aug 9, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@irajs
Copy link
Contributor

irajs commented Aug 9, 2019

DASH clients MAY support the presentation of [=dynamic MPDs=].

Don't we want all client support dynamic MPDs?

Suggested text
This document requires:
DASH clients SHALL support the presentation of [=dynamic MPDs=].

@sandersaares
Copy link
Member

sandersaares commented Nov 25, 2019

This is something of a philosophical question. Is DASH-IF guidelines a set of "things clients should support"? Some believe it to be so, e.g. to say that all clients must support AAC and H.264. Another viewpoint is that DASH-IF guidelines should be a description of how to implement things, without going too far into saying what features are to be implemented.

I am netural on which interpretation DASH-IF should pursue but given the recent trend toward moving away from defining codec interoperability and staying more on the structural level, I think DASH-IF guidelines in general are floating toward the latter interptetation - of leaving it up to implementors to decide what features to implement and just describing how to do it well.

Unless we plan to actively pursue feature profiles, we should not make this a hard requirement. Given the present course of DASH-IF activities and the topics that attention is in practice focused on, I consider it unlikely that we decide to go into defining feature profiles.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants