-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 76
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Command to create new upstream tarball #14
Comments
#8 for a related issue -- also, my patches to move the Import path to the control header makes this easier too -- Not sure where that should live; perhaps an importable module under dh-make-golang, or perhaps a new repo? Thoughts, @stapelberg ? |
If there is a patch to uscan (as mentioned in #8), there would be no need for this feature. dh-make-golang could actually use uscan to download the tarballs when possible. |
#77 will make it easy to add new commands. I am willing to open a PR that adds a command for this. $ dh-make-golang tarball <goimportpath>
$ gbp import-orig ../<tarball> |
Good idea, @aviau, are you still planning to do it? |
I am not putting any time on this feature right now, so please feel free to do it yourself. |
I might not be capable of doing that, but I've got an idea for an easier start for me. I'm thinking to add a new CC: @stapelberg Thx |
I’m not sure I fully understand yet. Can you explain what the individual types would differ from each other please? |
Oh, there'll be only one type added, for As for "none-go, none, debian, plain" etc, that was me proposing a proper name for the added type. |
Sorry, I still don’t quite follow. dh-make-golang currently initializes a git repository to be used with git-buildpackage. What change exactly are you suggesting? What do you mean when you say “plain Debian git repo”? |
Oh, now I know what you mean, sorry, here it goes, dh-make-golang currently initializes a git repository to be used with git-buildpackage, but it is only meant for go packages. I'm thinking to add a new |
For that purpose, people should use the more general dh-make instead: https://manpages.debian.org/stretch/dh-make/dh_make.1.en.html :) |
thanks for the link. I took a look, so... does |
I’m not entirely sure if there’s an option for that, but dh_make is where you should contribute the feature, if it’s not yet implemented |
OK. got you. |
Correct me if this is outside the scope of the project, but I would like a command to create a new tarball. That would mean running only the
makeUpstreamSourceTarball
function.So that I can do something like this:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: