Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move to junitparser==2.2.0, removing workaround solved in new version #189

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2021

Conversation

EnricoMi
Copy link
Owner

Issue weiwei/junitparser#71 has been resolved, upgrading junitparser version and removing workaorund.

@github-actions
Copy link

Unit Test Results (Linux)

     15 files  ±0       15 suites  ±0   33s ⏱️ -5s
   248 tests ±0     248 ✔️ ±0    0 💤 ±0  0 ±0 
3 720 runs  ±0  3 680 ✔️ ±0  40 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit c8998d9. ± Comparison against base commit 8c0ddcc.

@github-actions
Copy link

Unit Test Results (setup-python)

     15 files  ±0       15 suites  ±0   33s ⏱️ -5s
   248 tests ±0     248 ✔️ ±0    0 💤 ±0  0 ±0 
3 720 runs  ±0  3 680 ✔️ ±0  40 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit c8998d9. ± Comparison against base commit 8c0ddcc.

@github-actions
Copy link

Unit Test Results (Windows)

     15 files  ±0       15 suites  ±0   33s ⏱️ -5s
   248 tests ±0     248 ✔️ ±0    0 💤 ±0  0 ±0 
3 720 runs  ±0  3 680 ✔️ ±0  40 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit c8998d9. ± Comparison against base commit 8c0ddcc.

@github-actions
Copy link

Unit Test Results (macOS)

     15 files  ±0       15 suites  ±0   33s ⏱️ -5s
   248 tests ±0     248 ✔️ ±0    0 💤 ±0  0 ±0 
3 720 runs  ±0  3 680 ✔️ ±0  40 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit c8998d9. ± Comparison against base commit 8c0ddcc.

@github-actions
Copy link

Unit Test Results (Dockerfile)

     15 files  ±0       15 suites  ±0   33s ⏱️ -5s
   248 tests ±0     248 ✔️ ±0    0 💤 ±0  0 ±0 
3 720 runs  ±0  3 680 ✔️ ±0  40 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit c8998d9. ± Comparison against base commit 8c0ddcc.

@github-actions
Copy link

Unit Test Results (Test Files)

  24 files  ±0      4 errors  21 suites  ±0   39m 12s ⏱️ ±0s
272 tests ±0  227 ✔️ ±0  18 💤 ±0  23 ±0  4 🔥 ±0 
437 runs  ±0  354 ✔️ ±0  53 💤 ±0  25 ±0  5 🔥 ±0 

For more details on these parsing errors, failures and errors, see this check.

Results for commit c8998d9. ± Comparison against base commit 8c0ddcc.

@github-actions
Copy link

Unit Test Results (Docker Image)

     15 files  ±0       15 suites  ±0   33s ⏱️ -5s
   248 tests ±0     248 ✔️ ±0    0 💤 ±0  0 ±0 
3 720 runs  ±0  3 680 ✔️ ±0  40 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit c8998d9. ± Comparison against base commit 8c0ddcc.

@github-actions
Copy link

Unit Test Results (reference)

     15 files  ±0       15 suites  ±0   33s ⏱️ -5s
   248 tests ±0     248 ✔️ ±0    0 💤 ±0  0 ±0 
3 720 runs  ±0  3 680 ✔️ ±0  40 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit c8998d9. ± Comparison against base commit 8c0ddcc.

@EnricoMi
Copy link
Owner Author

@kvanbere the root cause for #184 has been fixed upstream. I have reverted the workaround and upgraded to the latest junitparser version. Can you please test if the issue is still fixed for you?

uses: EnricoMi/publish-unit-test-result-action/composite@branch-upgrade-junitparser-2.2.0

@kvanbere
Copy link

kvanbere commented Nov 19, 2021

OK, thanks! I will try this today.

Edit: I have kicked off this test build, so I will have the results soon.

@kvanbere
Copy link

Yes, it is working 👍

@EnricoMi EnricoMi merged commit b7e2f8f into master Nov 20, 2021
@EnricoMi EnricoMi deleted the branch-upgrade-junitparser-2.2.0 branch November 20, 2021 09:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants