Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ICA-AROMA confusion/documentation #551

Open
l-espana opened this issue May 17, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

ICA-AROMA confusion/documentation #551

l-espana opened this issue May 17, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@l-espana
Copy link

Thanks so much for all your efforts on this project! I especially appreciate the quality check files with both individual subject and overall project info - this is incredibly helpful for our larger projects! 馃挴

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
It's not entirely clear to me how ICA-AROMA is used/handled. If it's excluded from confound removal, it still appears in the quality check (which I think is intended). From my understanding, the output from ICA-AROMA includes the "non-aggressive" denoised image, with more "aggressive" data saved for the user to handle later. Is this image used regardless of whether or not it's included in the confound removal? If it is included in the confound removal, does that mean that the more "aggressive" confounds are also removed or just that the "non-aggressive" image is used along with any additional confounds? It would appear ICA-AROMA runs no matter what, but it's not clear what outputs are used when.

Describe the solution you'd like
It'd be nice to have clearer documentation on what confounds are removed when and how ICA-AROMA data is used.

Describe alternatives you've considered
I've tried a couple of different runs of HALFpipe, with and without, ICA-AROMA and looked through the code, but can't quite tease this apart.

Additional context
Using HALFpipe v.1.2.2 ("1.2.2.post1.dev189+g5579a7f").

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants