Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 9, 2023. It is now read-only.

Advanced Medical Imaging Viewer #4

Open
fox1t opened this issue Aug 23, 2019 · 10 comments
Open

Advanced Medical Imaging Viewer #4

fox1t opened this issue Aug 23, 2019 · 10 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
Milestone

Comments

@fox1t
Copy link
Member

fox1t commented Aug 23, 2019

馃殌 Feature Proposal

We need an advanced viewer component.

Motivation

Our users need to make all of they work inside HospitalRun. One of the most important task is the be able to open the most common medical file formats.
One of the most complete libs out there is https://github.com/OHIF/Viewers

We need to understand how to implement it as reusable component: as usual, we will wrap it inside our own APIs.

@fox1t fox1t added enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Aug 23, 2019
@fox1t fox1t added this to To do in Version 2.0 via automation Aug 23, 2019
@fox1t
Copy link
Member Author

fox1t commented Aug 23, 2019

@jackcmeyer what do you think about this?

@fox1t
Copy link
Member Author

fox1t commented Aug 23, 2019

Some references could be find here: https://docs.ohif.org/deployment/#embedded-viewer
on npm: https://www.npmjs.com/package/@ohif/viewer

@jackcmeyer
Copy link
Member

@jackcmeyer what do you think about this?

https://docs.ohif.org/deployment/recipes/embedded-viewer.html. I think that this page will be helpful for us.

The one big concern that I had was the potential for conflicting dependencies described here. However, according to the docs that can be alleviated by embedding this into an iframe.

Seems like the docs are pretty good with an activity GitHub repo and community.

Have you been able to find any alternatives to compare against?

@fox1t
Copy link
Member Author

fox1t commented Aug 23, 2019

I found pretty of them. But the open health imaging foundation is somehow close to our ideas. The viewer is surely one of the most mature and they are supporting other core projects as https://github.com/dcmjs-org/dicomweb-server/ (yes, we will help dcmjs-org in making dicomweb-server, and they are using couchdb and fastfiy too!).
You can find other viewers here

@dannyrb
Copy link

dannyrb commented Aug 24, 2019

馃憢 I'm one of the core maintainers over at OHIF and Cornerstonejs. I've helped integrate both as medical image viewing solutions in a number of applications through my consulting work with Radical Imaging.

More than happy to volunteer my time to assist with an integration when the time comes. Depending on your needs, the approach will change, but I'm sure we can accommodate your use cases ^_^

@matteovivona matteovivona added this to the v0.2.0 milestone Sep 16, 2019
@stale stale bot added the wontfix This will not be worked on label Nov 15, 2019
@HospitalRun HospitalRun deleted a comment from stale bot Nov 15, 2019
@stale stale bot removed the wontfix This will not be worked on label Nov 15, 2019
@matteovivona matteovivona modified the milestones: v0.2.0, v1.0.0 Feb 20, 2020
matteovivona pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 22, 2020
@ChillarAnand
Copy link

Looks like this is an old issue. Any updates on this?

@cjkarande
Copy link

Hi @fox1t and @jackcmeyer, any proposed plan for integrating OHIF-Viewer with HospitalRun?

@fox1t
Copy link
Member Author

fox1t commented Aug 28, 2020

@cjkarande unfortunately, not yet! :(

@DrewGregory
Copy link

DrewGregory commented Dec 29, 2020

@fox1t @blestab @jackcmeyer @morrme Do we feel that starting with OHIF-Viewer is a good step? If so, I or @anthonyaperez would love to take this on.

@matteovivona
Copy link
Contributor

as far as I know, no code has been written yet. only r&d activities. you can work on it. @fox1t thoughts on that?

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
Version 2.0
  
To do
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants