Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Debugger: Allow comments on instructions #210

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

adamchalmers
Copy link
Collaborator

@adamchalmers adamchalmers commented Mar 13, 2024

Closes #205

The input JSON has been modified. Previously it accepted a Vec, now that is just one field of a JSON object.

The other field is a map from instruction indices to string comments. These comments show up in the debugger as events at the start of that instruction.

Grackle will be updated to set these comments, to make it easier to read Grackle traces in this debugger.

Closes #205

The input JSON has been modified. Previously it accepted a Vec<Instruction>, now that is just one field of a JSON object.

The other field is a map from instruction indices to string comments. These comments show up in the debugger as events at the start of that instruction.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 13, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 23 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (main@f38096b). Click here to learn what that means.

Files Patch % Lines
execution-plan-debugger/src/ui.rs 0.00% 13 Missing ⚠️
execution-plan-debugger/src/main.rs 0.00% 10 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #210   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   49.33%           
=======================================
  Files           ?       47           
  Lines           ?     5007           
  Branches        ?        0           
=======================================
  Hits            ?     2470           
  Misses          ?     2537           
  Partials        ?        0           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 49.33% <0.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

KCVM instructions should include comment
1 participant