Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

CLI for kover #238

Closed
Vacxe opened this issue Sep 19, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

CLI for kover #238

Vacxe opened this issue Sep 19, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
Design needed Feature Feature request issue type Kover Coverage Tool S: postponed Status: work on the issue is not in the short term plans
Milestone
Release 0.9.0

Comments

@Vacxe
Copy link

Vacxe commented Sep 19, 2022

Does Kover have a CLI similar with JaCoCo ?

I using JaCoCo to visualise coverage for UI tests. On assemble stage I preparing all .class files and then UI tests sharded with Marathon on two agents. As an aggregation I have .classs files and .ecs from devices. And then I can generate total coverage from those artifacts with CLI.

Is it possible to have the same functionality with this library?
@shanshin
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi,
at the moment there are no CLI tools in Kover

@shanshin shanshin added improvement Feature Feature request issue type Design needed labels Sep 19, 2022
@shanshin shanshin added S: postponed Status: work on the issue is not in the short term plans Kover Coverage Tool labels Oct 27, 2022
@shanshin shanshin added this to the Release 0.9.0 milestone Oct 27, 2022
@shanshin
Copy link
Collaborator

Closed as a duplicate of #322

@shanshin shanshin closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Mar 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Design needed Feature Feature request issue type Kover Coverage Tool S: postponed Status: work on the issue is not in the short term plans
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Release 0.9.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@Vacxe @shanshin