Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add test for keyed Int types #58

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jan 7, 2019
Merged

Add test for keyed Int types #58

merged 3 commits into from Jan 7, 2019

Conversation

hodovani
Copy link
Contributor

@hodovani hodovani commented Jan 7, 2019

Add test for keyd Int, Int8, Int16, Int32, Int64, UInt, UInt8, UInt16, UInt32, UInt64 types.

@hodovani hodovani self-assigned this Jan 7, 2019
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 7, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #58 into master will increase coverage by 2.09%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #58      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   66.38%   68.48%   +2.09%     
==========================================
  Files          30       30              
  Lines        1431     1431              
==========================================
+ Hits          950      980      +30     
+ Misses        481      451      -30
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...s/XMLCoder/Decoder/XMLKeyedDecodingContainer.swift 78.72% <0%> (+11.34%) ⬆️
...s/XMLCoder/Encoder/XMLKeyedEncodingContainer.swift 61.44% <0%> (+16.86%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update de361c7...e1f77b7. Read the comment docs.

@MaxDesiatov MaxDesiatov changed the title Add test for keyd Int types Add test for keyed Int types Jan 7, 2019
@hodovani hodovani merged commit cdb4f1c into master Jan 7, 2019
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the increase-test-coverage branch January 7, 2019 12:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants