Bug: Xcode Previews fail to find transitive frameworks when using --define=apple.experimental.tree_artifact_outputs=0
#2641
Comments
brentleyjones
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 6, 2023
Part of #2641. This gets us most of the way to fixing Xcode Previews when not using tree artifacts. The last thing needed is adding these products to an output group for Xcode previews, otherwise unfocused frameworks aren’t extracted. --------- Signed-off-by: Brentley Jones <github@brentleyjones.com>
|
As of #2779:
|
brentleyjones
changed the title
--define=apple.experimental.tree_artifact_outputs=0--define=apple.experimental.tree_artifact_outputs=0
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Description
We don't unarchive transitive frameworks when copying them over to
SwiftUIPreviewsFrameworks. This is an issue when using--define=apple.experimental.tree_artifact_outputs=0.Reproduction steps
In
examples/integration(which currently sets--define=apple.experimental.tree_artifact_outputs=0) try to use theUIXcode Preview.Expected behavior
We shouldn't unarchive artifacts in
copy_outputs.sh. Instead we should generate an unarchiving action, and depend on that instead in the output groups. Then, regardless of whatapple.experimental.tree_artifact_outputsis set to, we will always have a tree artifact.rules_xcodeproj version
1.11.0
Xcode version
15.0
Bazel version
6.4.0rc1
rules_apple version
No response
rules_swift version
No response
Additional information
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: