Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Bug] Sometimes tmtv has wrong invert for the fusion #4148

Open
sedghi opened this issue May 17, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

[Bug] Sometimes tmtv has wrong invert for the fusion #4148

sedghi opened this issue May 17, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
@sedghi
Labels
fixed-in-dev-await-release This issue is fixed in master (viewer-dev) but we are pending testing for release (viewer.ohif.org)

Comments

@sedghi
Copy link
Member

sedghi commented May 17, 2024

Describe the Bug

If you refresh, it seems like at some point, one of the viewports in the fusion row will become inverted for some reason in tmtv

Steps to Reproduce

refresh tmtv

The current behavior

d

The expected behavior

d

OS

d

Node version

d

Browser

d
@sedghi sedghi added Awaiting Reproduction Can we reproduce the reported bug? Bug Verified Bug reported, reproducible, and verified. and removed Awaiting Reproduction Can we reproduce the reported bug? labels May 17, 2024
@jenny-hm-lee
Copy link

we have seen this as well.

@03shek
Copy link

03shek commented May 30, 2024

This is in MPR mode also, viewports should be synced in inverting, but they're not

@sedghi sedghi added fixed-in-dev-await-release This issue is fixed in master (viewer-dev) but we are pending testing for release (viewer.ohif.org) and removed Bug Verified Bug reported, reproducible, and verified. labels May 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@sedghi sedghi

Labels
fixed-in-dev-await-release This issue is fixed in master (viewer-dev) but we are pending testing for release (viewer.ohif.org)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@jenny-hm-lee @sedghi @03shek