New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[REQ] Overall python generators syntax and format improvements #16384
Comments
Hi @anis-campos, I'm checking this out today, coming from #16378. I saw several things that could be improved (personal opinion):
Could you perhaps create a tasklist (or something similar) in this issue to track down the different improvements that could be done? |
Certainly, it was the main goal behind this issue, any suggestion is welcomed, thanks for that. |
This is a first step to improve the Python CI: #16643 |
This is now enforced in the CI, Python 3.7 to 3.11 are supported. The project will consider dropping Python 3.7 once Pydantic v2 will drop support for it: pydantic/pydantic#7188
I don't remember what you meant with this one 😅 The CI now runs most of the client samples tests with all the supported Python versions 👍
#16624 has been merged now. I proposed #16691 and #16692 to start to improve the typing information. |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Following #16377, and seeing that there is still work to be done (#16382, #16378, etc...) , it would be more effective to create a issue to track the advancement
Describe the solution you'd like
There is several aspects to this issue:
pyupgrade
, can point at what needs to be changed by fixing the samples and changing the generator to achieve the same.Some optional points:
Task list
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: