New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve efficiency of writing MessageHistory as bytes #851
Comments
peter-lawrey
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 14, 2024
peter-lawrey
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 14, 2024
peter-lawrey
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 15, 2024
peter-lawrey
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 12, 2024
…g MessageHistory as bytes #851 (#856) * Make history.as.bytes true by default to improve efficiency of writing MessageHistory as bytes #851 * Added support for copyTo of Message History in bytes format * Added support for copyTo of Message History in bytes format * Added support for copyTo of Message History in bytes format * Code tidy * Use a resource pool * Add a special HISTORY_MESSAGE BacketType instead of reusing UNKNOWN * Remove commented code * Deprecate BYTES_MARSHALLABLE * Added a comment * Fix merge problem
peter-lawrey
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 12, 2024
…g MessageHistory as bytes #851 (#856) * Make history.as.bytes true by default to improve efficiency of writing MessageHistory as bytes #851 * Added support for copyTo of Message History in bytes format * Added support for copyTo of Message History in bytes format * Added support for copyTo of Message History in bytes format * Code tidy * Use a resource pool * Add a special HISTORY_MESSAGE BacketType instead of reusing UNKNOWN * Remove commented code * Deprecate BYTES_MARSHALLABLE * Added a comment * Fix merge problem
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Currently, VanillaMessageHistory uses marshalling code via Bytes; however, it's faster to use raw memory access when direct memory is available.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: