Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SVE Test case 756 - clarification| Is Object Instance allowed in the payload #575

Open
naveenkumarl89 opened this issue Apr 18, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@naveenkumarl89
Copy link

OMA-ETS-LightweightM2M_INT-V1_2-20231003-A:

https://www.openmobilealliance.org/release/LightweightM2M/ETS/OMA-ETS-LightweightM2M_INT-V1_2-20231003-A.pdf
"6.3.16. LightweightM2M-1.1-int-226 -- Write (Partial Update) on Object Instance" case :
In addition to the Resource values, the payload contains the Object Instance.

payload

Is this allowed?

@sbernard31
Copy link

(I'm not OMA member)

In addition to the Resource values, the payload contains the Object Instance.
Is this allowed?

I guess it depends of used Content Format.
In you case, it seems you are using TLV, so the question is : is it allowed by TLV format ?

AFAIK, There is nothing which doesn't allow that. But in this case, the Object Instance TLV entry is useless.
See : #452

In Leshan we support both with or without object instance TLV entry BUT when object instance TLV entry is present which check consistency between ID in TLV and ID in request.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants