Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add-OnlineResponderArrayMember not synchronized #147

Open
bencoremans opened this issue May 19, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

Add-OnlineResponderArrayMember not synchronized #147

bencoremans opened this issue May 19, 2021 · 4 comments
Labels
Research Requires additional research or specification clarification

Comments

@bencoremans
Copy link

With the Add-OnlineResponderArrayMember I managed to add an online responder tot the ocsp array, but with an error. In the console their is a message: "Array Membership information is not synchronized". Is this still by design and will I have to manage this through the mmc?
I know in the past it was possible to add an array member with powershell, but there were issues with this. What I saw was that the console didn't work anymore. With your cmdlets this behavior is gone, but do I still have to sync manual between array controller and array member?

@Crypt32
Copy link
Collaborator

Crypt32 commented May 19, 2021

Is this still by design and will I have to manage this through the mmc?

it is by design, a limitation of API. What you can try is to restart ocspsvc service to force configuration synchronization with array controller.

@bencoremans
Copy link
Author

Ok, thank you. Restarting the ocspsvc service or server doesn't do the trick unfortunately.

@Crypt32
Copy link
Collaborator

Crypt32 commented May 21, 2021

Sorry, I don't have an answer to this question. I'm still researching this. MMC uses some hidden APIs which aren't documented. I was able to track down to DLLs used by MMC, but not exact exported functions.

@bencoremans
Copy link
Author

It's not a big issue, but it's a minor flaw in our automated environment. I hope you will find the answer on this in the future, so I can take away this minor flaw.
Thank you for your awesome work!

@Crypt32 Crypt32 added the Research Requires additional research or specification clarification label Sep 11, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Research Requires additional research or specification clarification
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants