Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Investigate 'strong mode' #63

Open
StoneCypher opened this issue Apr 7, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

Investigate 'strong mode' #63

StoneCypher opened this issue Apr 7, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@StoneCypher
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for reminding me, @dmarr
@marr
Copy link

marr commented Apr 7, 2015

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Qk0qC4s_XNCLemj42FqfsRLp49nDQMZ1y7fwf5YjaI4/edit?usp=sharing

@StoneCypher
Copy link
Owner Author

s/@dmarr/@marr/g

@jtremback
Copy link

Wow, throwing on a nonexistent key instead of returning undefined sounds like a huge pain to program with. The rest of it seems ok, if it actually leads to faster code.

@StoneCypher
Copy link
Owner Author

Sounds like a much smaller pain to me than the alternative, but to each their own on opinion terms

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@marr @StoneCypher @jtremback