Mention RateLimit Draft

[ioggstream]

I wish

The project to mention the ratelimit-headers draft: https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-polli-ratelimit-headers-03.html

Notes

It seems we're trying to standardize the behavior you have implemented :)
Please take a look at https://github.com/ioggstream/draft-polli-ratelimit-headers

If you confirm that, we can cite actix-ratelimit in the spec as an implementor. In that case just drop a comment here:

• Improve description of current API rate-limiting landscape. ioggstream/draft-polli-ratelimit-headers#1

[TerminalWitchcraft]

Hi,

Seems like to abide by the convention mentioned, I need to change the header names from x-ratelimit-remaining to Ratelimit-remaining and so on. If this is the case, I can do the change in the next release while also mentioning about the same in this project's README. Is this what you expect?

[ioggstream]

For now it would just be great to mention the draft in the README, so that I can:

• add actix-ratelimit in the I-D implementor list
• if you like - add your name here https://github.com/ioggstream/draft-polli-ratelimit-headers/blob/master/draft-polli-ratelimit-headers.md#acknowledgements

Once we go RFC we can change the names :P

As an implementor, your feedback on the actual contents of the draft are very welcome!