Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix REPL ASI handling when new input starts with '-' #944

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 15, 2020
Merged

Fix REPL ASI handling when new input starts with '-' #944

merged 1 commit into from Feb 15, 2020

Conversation

cspotcode
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #936

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 78.764% when pulling efc3717 on fix-936 into b90754e on master.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 78.764% when pulling efc3717 on fix-936 into b90754e on master.

@cspotcode cspotcode added this to In Review in Andrew Bradley's Tasks Feb 11, 2020
@cspotcode cspotcode merged commit 5b5ae91 into master Feb 15, 2020
@cspotcode cspotcode moved this from In Review to Merged to master in Andrew Bradley's Tasks Feb 15, 2020
This was referenced Mar 18, 2020
Closed
Closed
Open
Closed
Open
Merged
Closed
Open
Open
Closed
Closed
Merged
Closed
This was referenced Mar 25, 2020
Merged
Merged
Open
Merged
This was referenced Apr 12, 2020
Closed
Merged
Merged
Merged
Merged
Merged
This was referenced Apr 13, 2020
Merged
Merged
This was referenced Apr 21, 2020
Closed
Closed
Open
Merged
Closed
Closed
@snyk-bot snyk-bot mentioned this pull request May 4, 2020
Open
@cspotcode cspotcode deleted the fix-936 branch May 9, 2020 20:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@blakeembrey blakeembrey blakeembrey approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
Andrew Bradley's Tasks
Merged to master
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Use of >>> operator gives different results for same expression
3 participants
@cspotcode @coveralls @blakeembrey