Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rewrite requestMIDIAccess to hook into permissions #220

Open
miketaylr opened this issue Oct 20, 2021 · 8 comments
Open

Rewrite requestMIDIAccess to hook into permissions #220

miketaylr opened this issue Oct 20, 2021 · 8 comments
Assignees
Labels
class: substantive https://www.w3.org/2023/Process-20230612/#correction-classes status: ready for editing Enough information should be available to implement this change in the spec
Milestone

Comments

@miketaylr
Copy link
Contributor

As a followup to #219 (review)

@cwilso
Copy link
Contributor

cwilso commented Oct 26, 2021

What remains on top of #294?

@miketaylr
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry for not writing a better description!

Essentially, https://webaudio.github.io/web-midi-api/#dom-navigator-requestmidiaccess needs to hook into the Permissions algorithms.

@marcoscaceres wrote some more explicit suggestions in #219 (review).

@miketaylr
Copy link
Contributor Author

I will attempt to not mess this up.

miketaylr added a commit to miketaylr/web-midi-api that referenced this issue Oct 27, 2021
miketaylr added a commit to miketaylr/web-midi-api that referenced this issue Oct 27, 2021
miketaylr added a commit to miketaylr/web-midi-api that referenced this issue Oct 27, 2021
miketaylr added a commit to miketaylr/web-midi-api that referenced this issue Oct 27, 2021
miketaylr added a commit to miketaylr/web-midi-api that referenced this issue Oct 27, 2021
@hoch
Copy link
Member

hoch commented Apr 6, 2023

Teleconference 4/6:
Remove "particularly if system exclusive access is requested." in the second paragraph of https://www.w3.org/TR/webmidi/#requestmidiaccess.

@hoch hoch self-assigned this Apr 6, 2023
@miketaylr
Copy link
Contributor Author

I will attempt to not mess this up.

(It looks like I never finished...)

@hoch
Copy link
Member

hoch commented Apr 6, 2023

No worries! We'll take it from here. :)

@miketaylr
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yay, thanks! I'll go ahead and close my WIP PR now.

@hoch hoch added the status: ready for editing Enough information should be available to implement this change in the spec label Sep 11, 2023
@mjwilson-google mjwilson-google added the class: substantive https://www.w3.org/2023/Process-20230612/#correction-classes label Sep 13, 2023
@mjwilson-google mjwilson-google added this to the CR milestone Sep 14, 2023
@mjwilson-google mjwilson-google added status: needs WG review Needs to be discussed with the Audio Working Group before proceeding and removed status: ready for editing Enough information should be available to implement this change in the spec labels Oct 15, 2023
@mjwilson-google
Copy link
Contributor

Audio WG 2023-10-18 conclusion:

@mjwilson-google mjwilson-google added status: ready for editing Enough information should be available to implement this change in the spec and removed status: needs WG review Needs to be discussed with the Audio Working Group before proceeding labels Oct 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
class: substantive https://www.w3.org/2023/Process-20230612/#correction-classes status: ready for editing Enough information should be available to implement this change in the spec
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants