Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Is the RFC 6979 can be supported? #207

Open
7kms opened this issue Apr 23, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Is the RFC 6979 can be supported? #207

7kms opened this issue Apr 23, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@7kms
Copy link

7kms commented Apr 23, 2023 •
edited

the keygen of the individual party doesn't satisfy rfc6979
is there anyway to add this feature feasible?
@ThantZin-develope
Copy link

This is exactly the request I'ld like to ask.

@TristanSchorn
Copy link

Bumping this one, it's quite important. Without RFC-6979 compliance, signatures are non-deterministic. And a number of dapps utilize RFC-6979 compliant determinism.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6979

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@TristanSchorn @7kms @ThantZin-develope