New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Feature Request] Optional prompt to use exclamation (!) to denote breaking change #38
Comments
Received, thanks for the let me know more, you can look at this option |
I have been following this option, you can check out this tweet. |
This just adds additional types in addition to the default ones. I want to be able to append an exclamation mark to every type (
This one is for changelogs, not for Commitizen. |
In the next version I will add an environment variable for better use. What better opinion do you have? |
I was thinking of an optional prompt " |
I also need to consider that users who use commitlint will return false so mark is not provided by default. I think there should be a configuration item to give prompt to cooperate with BREAKCHANGE Environment variables are also prepared for no-config for anyway, |
I'm using commitlint and using the exclamation mark works just fine. |
great~ Maybe this feature needs more than cli.it will come soon |
@sitiom Use the environment variable Demo : Can add options |
it use exclamation (!) to denote breaking change see: https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#examples link #38
Looks good to me! |
I expect that I will a release on the weekend, of course I want the cli to go live together, I will give a notice at that time, thank you for your suggestion |
…t mark `!` #39 (#38) feat(cz-git): add `markBreakingChangeMode` options to add extra prompt mark `!` it use exclamation (!) to denote breaking change see: https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#examples
@sitiom Guide see: https://cz-git.qbenben.com/recipes/breakingchange.html |
Thanks, it works as intended so far. |
@Zhengqbbb Wait, if I input "no" in the breaking change prompt it won't ask for a breaking change footer. Regardless, it should still ask for a breaking change description because it is possible to omit the |
I didn't want to add another question, but that said, it should be added and matched with the But what I'm not sure about is if this would be too verbose |
This is how I see it, if this mode is turned on, if you choose no, then it means that there is no BREAKINGCHANGE |
Not necessarily, you can omit the
|
I just thought of it now; since both options can be omitted from each other, shouldn't the |
wait five mins |
NO, this will lose the no-config convenience, and you ignore a point that only feat fix will have this question by default |
Oh, Yeah, except those not defined in |
The latest version 🌟(v1.3.7)🌟 should be resolve this issue request , please have a try. 💪 |
BTW you can try |
It works as intended now, thanks!
Thanks. I'm used to having a |
I will say no. I'm also a shell developer, I know this behavior is very disruptive to the user's environment. it's up to the user to decide and create. |
@Zhengqbbb the issue seems to still haven't been fixed in |
Is there any operation steps, It fine on my env |
There's still a break mode in |
You mean, BREAKINGCHANGE footer is not appearing, Emmm
|
Oh ok, it seems that I have misunderstood it, sorry. Just ignore my previous comments, everything is working fine. |
Use the CLI a lot and you'll build muscle memory and experience the feeling of being fast and simple! ❤️ |
Through the study of this article, I have changed my previous idea and added a command line entry
🤗 |
Interesting, that's why git recognizes |
💭 Describe the feature
See Conventional Commits examples:
💡 Proposed Solution
An option to denote an exclamation mark
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: