"Resource not accessible by integration" #10

AstraLuma · 2019-09-03T21:20:56Z

https://github.com/ppb/pursuedpybear/pull/359/checks?check_run_id=211188070

https://github.com/ppb/pursuedpybear/blob/master/.github/workflows/greetings.yml

JJ · 2019-10-23T18:28:24Z

This happens as soon as the person creating the PR does not have permission to the repository. I've been all day with this, and there does not seem to be a solution. Same problem as here actions/labeler#12.

AstraLuma · 2019-10-26T17:13:15Z

Eh? Actions run under their own credentials, not as a user??

JJ · 2019-10-26T18:35:38Z

Actions run as an user, but when they are running in a fork there are potential security problems, so they are degraded to "read-only"

AstraLuma · 2019-10-28T15:40:27Z

I'm confused. This is an action configured in the main repo for a PR in the main repo?

AstraLuma · 2019-10-28T17:21:49Z

Oh, PR events are sent to the fork under the source branch, not to to the target repo/branch?

mangelajo · 2019-12-05T15:26:44Z

Ok, github needs to fix this. I'm facing the same thing while trying to create an action.

kaxil · 2020-01-06T03:40:58Z

We faced similar issue when trying to use greeting for Airflow project (https://github.com/apache/airflow). So we developed a Github app which is working well for us in case someone faces similar issue:

https://github.com/kaxil/boring-cyborg

joshgoebel · 2020-03-03T13:58:12Z

Is this the same issue as with labeler? actions/labeler#50

If so, can the same solution also be applied (at least as a stopgap)? Very frustrating that Github seems to push these actions hard in their UI but then they don't work with the most common use case on GitHub for OSS projects.

gunnsth · 2020-03-04T22:53:56Z

Getting this too: https://github.com/unidoc/unipdf/pull/269/checks?check_run_id=486244746
Would make sense to skip the action if needed resources are not available? Or an option to make it required/optional. Some actions might be required, but a greeting hardly, but this is flagging a valid PR as failing due to this.

joshgoebel · 2020-03-05T00:43:56Z

Some actions might be required, but a greeting hardly, but this is flagging a valid PR as failing due to this.

Yes, very good point also. Not all actions are created equal (in that they should kill the whole workflow from moving forward).

Borda · 2020-03-09T23:50:57Z

the same issue also here - https://github.com/PyTorchLightning/pytorch-lightning/pull/1101/checks?check_run_id=496573752

See actions/first-interaction#10

joshgoebel · 2020-04-19T20:14:16Z

Anyone alive here: Is this the same issue as with labeler? actions/labeler#50

I added this to a project but I guess I'm about to rip it out - the use case seems extremely limited - not at all suited for large OSS projects with many contributors. And those are exactly the projects where this type of thing would be most helpful.

Ecco · 2020-04-19T20:31:00Z

Unfortunately this is not specific to a given action / repository.

Anyone hit by this, please read this long comment I wrote and feel free to upvote it.

Because a creator of PR not have write permission on repository, this actions fail on all the PR created by community. This bug it is related on actions/first-interaction#10

According to actions/first-interaction#10 (comment), this should fix the issue with the failing of pytest on pull requests from forks.

Should resolve "Resource not accessible by integration" error message. actions/first-interaction#10 (comment)

actions/first-interaction#10 (comment)

barbaracabral · 2024-03-16T19:44:39Z

I had the same issue executing the Zap Action code scan with docker config: https://github.com/zaproxy/action-api-scan

…ccess to our repo Relevant read: Resource not accessible by integration actions/first-interaction#10 (comment) actions/first-interaction#10 (comment) Keeping your GitHub Actions and workflows secure Part 1: Preventing pwn requests https://securitylab.github.com/research/github-actions-preventing-pwn-requests/

actions/first-interaction#10 (comment)

JeroenKnoops mentioned this issue Oct 11, 2019

greetings.yml workflow does not seem to be correct. philips-software/overview#5

Closed

JJ mentioned this issue Oct 23, 2019

Troubles posting comment to a pull request using GitHub app API octokit/octokit.js#1030

Closed

kaxil mentioned this issue Jan 4, 2020

[AIRFLOW-6449] Remove Github actions until a known bug is fixed apache/airflow#7035

Merged

6 tasks

OlegZharkov mentioned this issue Feb 28, 2020

re-PR Olegs work research-software-ecosystem/content#106

Closed

joshgoebel mentioned this issue Mar 3, 2020

Greeting for the first-time contributors doesn't work highlightjs/highlight.js#2446

Closed

gunnsth added a commit to unidoc/unipdf that referenced this issue Mar 9, 2020

Stop greeting on PRs as does not work with Actions

ed30fe6

See actions/first-interaction#10

amey-kudari mentioned this issue Mar 17, 2020

GitHub action to check for WIP PRs oppia/oppia#8861

Closed

bkimminich mentioned this issue Mar 18, 2020

Started failing with "##[error]Resource not accessible by integration" JJ/issue-greeting-action#10

Closed

AstraLuma mentioned this issue Mar 21, 2020

PR Welcome ppb/binny#2

Closed

sakshi-mishra mentioned this issue Mar 23, 2020

update contributing.md NREL/REopt_API#35

Closed

peaceiris mentioned this issue Mar 24, 2020

Action failed with error: Resource not accessible by integration peaceiris/actions-label-commenter#24

Closed

mikebrow mentioned this issue Apr 21, 2020

remove broken greetings github action containerd/cri#1456

Merged

orf mentioned this issue May 1, 2020

Permission problem posting comments orf/cargo-bloat-action#142

Open

omurilo mentioned this issue May 6, 2020

improve lint-staged with jest and prettier lucasmontano/twitch#35

Merged

omurilo mentioned this issue May 7, 2020

Remove run this action on pull_request first interaction lucasmontano/twitch#37

Merged

catherinedoyel added a commit to catherinedoyel/ventoyimg that referenced this issue Jul 1, 2023

lmao actions/first-interaction#10 (comment)

d7db524

timcassell mentioned this issue Jul 6, 2023

Fix netcoreapp3.0 and older builds dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet#2352

Merged

kevinwallimann mentioned this issue Jul 10, 2023

Move permissions to job level AbsaOSS/ABRiS#333

Merged

gerw added a commit to Bouni/python-luxtronik that referenced this issue Jul 22, 2023

Update pytest.yml

b3247ca

According to actions/first-interaction#10 (comment), this should fix the issue with the failing of pytest on pull requests from forks.

gerw mentioned this issue Jul 22, 2023

Update pytest.yml Bouni/python-luxtronik#134

Merged

Bouni pushed a commit to Bouni/python-luxtronik that referenced this issue Jul 22, 2023

Update pytest.yml

0735765

According to actions/first-interaction#10 (comment), this should fix the issue with the failing of pytest on pull requests from forks.

tianyin mentioned this issue Jul 26, 2023

Add Cloudlab docs xlab-uiuc/acto#250

Merged

miniTalDev added a commit to miniTalDev/yolov5-lip-detection that referenced this issue Aug 6, 2023

update greetings.yml with pull_request_target (#677)

834f943

Should resolve "Resource not accessible by integration" error message. actions/first-interaction#10 (comment)

simonsan mentioned this issue Aug 21, 2023

ci: split PR build and release build to manually trigger builds of artifacts rustic-rs/rustic#838

Closed

rootxrishabh mentioned this issue Sep 9, 2023

Making a github bot to improve our repo's workflow kubearmor/KubeArmor#1082

Open

ClementWalter mentioned this issue Sep 11, 2023

Fix compare_snapshot CI kkrt-labs/kakarot-ssj#341

Merged

9 tasks

ZeLonewolf mentioned this issue Sep 22, 2023

Add shields for Nova Scotia scenic drives ZeLonewolf/openstreetmap-americana#912

Merged

rootxrishabh mentioned this issue Sep 29, 2023

feat(workflow): Github bot added kubearmor/KubeArmor#1415

Draft

7 tasks

This was referenced Oct 5, 2023

Large code base with hundreds of tests - summary missing bibipkins/dotnet-test-reporter#30

Closed

🐞 fix: check user login bibipkins/dotnet-test-reporter#37

Merged

LouisBrunner mentioned this issue Oct 18, 2023

Error: Resource not accessible by integration LouisBrunner/checks-action#190

Closed

aatmanvaidya mentioned this issue Oct 27, 2023

feat: github action shows comment on PR tattle-made/Uli#454

Closed

asumagic mentioned this issue Dec 1, 2023

Display coverage status in PRs speechbrain/speechbrain#2277

Draft

13 tasks

BlazingTwist added a commit to BlazingTwist/Clean-Code-Development-Jchess that referenced this issue Dec 4, 2023

Update maven.yml

f16d4bd

actions/first-interaction#10 (comment)

kchason mentioned this issue Jan 12, 2024

Limit Annotation Workflows kchason/case-validation-action#19

Merged

samamorgan mentioned this issue Jan 19, 2024

Modernize package soynatan/django-easy-audit#267

Merged

LouisBrunner mentioned this issue Jan 26, 2024

You must authenticate via a GitHub App LouisBrunner/checks-action#141

Closed

Keyrxng mentioned this issue Feb 18, 2024

Forks should not tag and link back to UBQ issues ubiquity/devpool-directory-bounties#15

Closed

psturc mentioned this issue Feb 20, 2024

feat: add estimate time to review PR command and GH action konflux-ci/qe-tools#78

Closed

jbampton mentioned this issue Mar 2, 2024

Broken GitHub Action First Interaction SalamLang/Salam#48

Closed

valeriazagontova mentioned this issue Mar 30, 2024

Anyone alive here: Is this the same issue as with labeler? https://github.com/actions/labeler/pull/50 actions/runner-images#9594

Closed

Wowlian added a commit to Wowlian/linkedin-skill-assessments-quizzes that referenced this issue May 27, 2024

- fix for greetings.yml

c8da7f8

actions/first-interaction#10 (comment)

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

"Resource not accessible by integration" #10

"Resource not accessible by integration" #10

AstraLuma commented Sep 3, 2019

JJ commented Oct 23, 2019 •

edited

AstraLuma commented Oct 26, 2019

JJ commented Oct 26, 2019

AstraLuma commented Oct 28, 2019

AstraLuma commented Oct 28, 2019 •

edited

mangelajo commented Dec 5, 2019

kaxil commented Jan 6, 2020

joshgoebel commented Mar 3, 2020 •

edited

gunnsth commented Mar 4, 2020 •

edited

joshgoebel commented Mar 5, 2020

Borda commented Mar 9, 2020

joshgoebel commented Apr 19, 2020 •

edited

Ecco commented Apr 19, 2020 •

edited

barbaracabral commented Mar 16, 2024

"Resource not accessible by integration" #10

"Resource not accessible by integration" #10

Comments

AstraLuma commented Sep 3, 2019

JJ commented Oct 23, 2019 • edited

AstraLuma commented Oct 26, 2019

JJ commented Oct 26, 2019

AstraLuma commented Oct 28, 2019

AstraLuma commented Oct 28, 2019 • edited

mangelajo commented Dec 5, 2019

kaxil commented Jan 6, 2020

joshgoebel commented Mar 3, 2020 • edited

gunnsth commented Mar 4, 2020 • edited

joshgoebel commented Mar 5, 2020

Borda commented Mar 9, 2020

joshgoebel commented Apr 19, 2020 • edited

Ecco commented Apr 19, 2020 • edited

barbaracabral commented Mar 16, 2024

JJ commented Oct 23, 2019 •

edited

AstraLuma commented Oct 28, 2019 •

edited

joshgoebel commented Mar 3, 2020 •

edited

gunnsth commented Mar 4, 2020 •

edited

joshgoebel commented Apr 19, 2020 •

edited

Ecco commented Apr 19, 2020 •

edited