Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extend the comparisons in README.md to Ramda #191

Open
tobia opened this issue May 12, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Extend the comparisons in README.md to Ramda #191

tobia opened this issue May 12, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
documentation README, usage & API docs, etc enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@tobia
Copy link

tobia commented May 12, 2021

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I found the comparisons to Underscore, Lodash, and wu.js in the README file very useful to get an idea of which problems of the latter libraries Ferrum was created to solve.

Describe the solution you'd like
I would like it if a knowledgeable person extended those comparisons to Ramda.

Describe alternatives you've considered
I'm studyng Ramda's documentation myself, but that is going to take a while.

@tobia tobia added the enhancement New feature or request label May 12, 2021
@koraa koraa added the documentation README, usage & API docs, etc label May 12, 2021
@koraa
Copy link
Contributor

koraa commented May 12, 2021

There is an old issue about a comparison to rambda somewhere, it's been a todo for a while now 😅
Hey how about an idea, the bottleneck for me is actually doing the writing…given that you are at this time studing the ramda documentation, how about you write down what you perceive the difference to be, we can hash it out together and then transfer that result to the readme?

@tobia
Copy link
Author

tobia commented May 12, 2021

Sure. I will try to do so.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation README, usage & API docs, etc enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants