Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ubuntu Noble flavor? #532

Open
poikilotherm opened this issue Apr 18, 2024 · 7 comments · May be fixed by #534
Open

Ubuntu Noble flavor? #532

poikilotherm opened this issue Apr 18, 2024 · 7 comments · May be fixed by #534
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@poikilotherm
Copy link

Please add the exact image (with tag) that you are using

eclipse-temurin:17-jre

Please add the version of Docker you are running

26.0.0

What happened?

I cannot yet use Ubuntu Noble (24.04 LTS), which is going to be released on April 25, for pre-release testing of my application.

Would a pull request to add Noble to config/hotspot.yml be welcome?

Relevant log output

No response

@poikilotherm poikilotherm added the bug Something isn't working label Apr 18, 2024
@karianna karianna added enhancement New feature or request and removed bug Something isn't working labels Apr 19, 2024
@karianna
Copy link
Contributor

@poikilotherm That would be good thank you.

poikilotherm added a commit to poikilotherm/adoptium-containers that referenced this issue Apr 19, 2024
@poikilotherm poikilotherm linked a pull request Apr 19, 2024 that will close this issue
@sxa sxa added the PMC-agenda label Apr 20, 2024
@sxa
Copy link
Member

sxa commented Apr 20, 2024

Adding pmc agenda label based on my comment in the PR so it should get discussed next week 😀

@gdams
Copy link
Member

gdams commented Apr 23, 2024

Noting that Ubuntu Noble goes GA on the 25th April.

@tellison
Copy link
Contributor

tellison commented May 1, 2024

The PMC discussed this request on 24 March. The conclusion was that temurin will continue to support Docker official base images and we there fore expect Noble to be supported in the corresponding release cycle.

@trandersen-ufst
Copy link

The PMC discussed this request on 24 March. The conclusion was that temurin will continue to support Docker official base images and we there fore expect Noble to be supported in the corresponding release cycle.

@tellison I am trying to find out when that will be for my team to prioritize. If I understand https://adoptium.net/support/#_release_roadmap correctly, that would be up to three weeks after the OpenJDK project releases a security update. This has just happened, so next time is in July and therefore the 24.04 docker images can be expected to show up in the middle of August. Is this correct?

@tellison
Copy link
Contributor

tellison commented May 1, 2024

I am trying to find out when that will be for my team to prioritize. If I understand https://adoptium.net/support/#_release_roadmap correctly, that would be up to three weeks after the OpenJDK project releases a security update. This has just happened, so next time is in July and therefore the 24.04 docker images can be expected to show up in the middle of August. Is this correct?

In theory, that logic is correct. However, we discussed in the PMC the ability to do an out of cycle publication of Noble-based official images.

The plan is to run our Temurin AQAvit tests on a Noble image, and if all looks good we would go ahead and publish a new Temurin official image based upon that. The tests should not take too long, but I can't give you a specific timeline to completion since the work is not yet scheduled.

You can follow the request to test as adoptium/aqa-tests#5271 which is a prereq to updating the dockerfiles etc.

@trandersen-ufst
Copy link

@tellison Thank you for the full explanation. This sound like a good way to handle the situation. I have subscribed to the request to test as suggested.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

6 participants