Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

storage type should be more specific #10

Open
agilgur5 opened this issue Jul 11, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

storage type should be more specific #10

agilgur5 opened this issue Jul 11, 2019 · 0 comments
Labels
scope: types Related to type definitions

Comments

@agilgur5
Copy link
Owner

The only reason it isn't is because there's a decent bit of work and decisions to ensure it conforms with localStorage and localForage (and similar type interfaces). See discussion in #8 (comment)
@agilgur5 agilgur5 added the types label Jul 21, 2019
@agilgur5 agilgur5 added scope: types Related to type definitions and removed types labels Feb 27, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
scope: types Related to type definitions
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@agilgur5