Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Status of testing Providers that were prepared on November 24, 2023 #35845

Closed
39 of 69 tasks
eladkal opened this issue Nov 24, 2023 · 18 comments
Closed
39 of 69 tasks

Status of testing Providers that were prepared on November 24, 2023 #35845

eladkal opened this issue Nov 24, 2023 · 18 comments
Labels
kind:meta High-level information important to the community testing status Status of testing releases

Comments

@eladkal
Copy link
Contributor

eladkal commented Nov 24, 2023

Body

I have a kind request for all the contributors to the latest provider packages release.
Could you please help us to test the RC versions of the providers?

The guidelines on how to test providers can be found in

Verify providers by contributors

Let us know in the comment, whether the issue is addressed.

Those are providers that require testing as there were some substantial changes introduced:

Provider amazon: 8.12.0rc1

Provider apache.impala: 1.2.1rc1

Provider atlassian.jira: 2.3.0rc1

Provider cncf.kubernetes: 7.10.0rc1

Provider common.io: 1.1.0rc1

Provider common.sql: 1.8.1rc1

Provider databricks: 5.0.1rc1

Provider dbt.cloud: 3.4.1rc1

Provider docker: 3.8.2rc1

Provider elasticsearch: 5.2.0rc1

Provider google: 10.12.0rc1

Provider microsoft.azure: 8.3.0rc1

Provider odbc: 4.2.0rc1

Provider openai: 1.0.1rc1

Provider opsgenie: 5.3.0rc1

Provider papermill: 3.5.0rc1

Provider redis: 3.4.1rc1

Provider snowflake: 5.1.2rc1

Provider trino: 5.4.1rc1

All users involved in the PRs:
@ferruzzi @champon1020 @tskir @Eric-Mendes @pubudu91 @dashton90 @o-nikolas @raphaelauv @bolleyboll @ccorleis @MaksYermak @kacpermuda @uranusjr @akshaychitneni @dmedora @Joffreybvn @evgenyslab
@ambika-garg @pankajkoti @potiuk @hussein-awala @ahzaz @tnyz @syedahsn @VladaZakharova @shohamy7 @austinletson @sseung00921 @dstandish @JDarDagran @bolkedebruin @vincbeck @ylnsnv @dirrao @Taragolis

Committer

  • I acknowledge that I am a maintainer/committer of the Apache Airflow project.
@eladkal eladkal added kind:meta High-level information important to the community testing status Status of testing releases labels Nov 24, 2023
@raphaelauv
Copy link
Contributor

#35600 work ✅

airflow-oss-bot added a commit to astronomer/astronomer-providers that referenced this issue Nov 25, 2023
@sseung00921
Copy link
Contributor

#35648 work ✅

@bolleyboll
Copy link
Contributor

#35799 work ✅

@dashton90
Copy link
Contributor

dashton90 commented Nov 25, 2023

#35790 works

It has caused a problem with the example DAG (addressed in #35839) but the operator changes themselves work

@eladkal
Copy link
Contributor Author

eladkal commented Nov 26, 2023

#35790 works

It has caused a problem with the example DAG (addressed in #35839) but the operator changes themselves work

Thanks. Since functionality work as expected this will not block rc1 release.

@hussein-awala
Copy link
Member

I tested #35185 and #35635, they work as expected.

@pankajkoti
Copy link
Member

pankajkoti commented Nov 26, 2023

Tested my set of PRs, all work fine, thank you for the release efforts!

@bolkedebruin
Copy link
Contributor

I would like to see a re-discussion of #32319 before including it.

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

potiuk commented Nov 26, 2023

I would like to see a re-discussion of #32319 before including it.

I think this is misunderstanding what #32319 wants to achieve. Commented there.

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

potiuk commented Nov 26, 2023

Conflirmed my template + reproducible builds worl (works great! PR shortly to a better PMC verification step is coming soon :) )

@dirrao
Copy link
Collaborator

dirrao commented Nov 27, 2023

Tested my PR #35579 and it is working as expected.

@Lee-W
Copy link
Member

Lee-W commented Nov 27, 2023

We tested it with our example DAGs with apache-airflow-providers-amazon, apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes, apache-airflow-providers-databricks, apache-airflow-providers-dbt-cloud, apache-airflow-providers-google, apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes, apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure, apache-airflow-providers-snowflake and everything works as expected. Thanks!

@ferruzzi
Copy link
Contributor

#35808 appears to be working as expected.

@Joffreybvn
Copy link
Contributor

#32319 works as expected !

@akshaychitneni
Copy link
Contributor

#34840 works as expected.

@champon1020
Copy link
Contributor

#34785 works as expected

@ambika-garg
Copy link
Contributor

ambika-garg commented Nov 28, 2023 via email

@eladkal
Copy link
Contributor Author

eladkal commented Nov 29, 2023

Thank you everyone.
Providers are released
I invite everyone to help improve providers for the next release, a list of open issues can be found here.

@eladkal eladkal closed this as completed Nov 29, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind:meta High-level information important to the community testing status Status of testing releases
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests