Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discussion: Using dependency parsing #69

Open
bdura opened this issue Apr 27, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Discussion: Using dependency parsing #69

bdura opened this issue Apr 27, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
discussion Discussion about architecture choices

Comments

@bdura
Copy link
Contributor

bdura commented Apr 27, 2022

Description

We might benefit from using a parse tree.

Parsing is a most transverse task, and could provide an easy way to create baselines for many pipeline components (qualifiers, linking events, etc).

However, this is uncharted territory for me. A few questions:

  • Has anyone tried using models trained on non-speciality French language in the clinical setting?
  • If re-training is needed, do you have an idea of the effort that's needed in terms of annotation?

Any thoughts?

@bdura bdura added the discussion Discussion about architecture choices label Apr 27, 2022
@percevalw
Copy link
Member

This could be interesting. However, I see two blocking points, which are precisely those you raise:

Maybe we could just re-annotate the specific formulas of the clinical domain but I have no doubt that this would require a significant effort.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discussion Discussion about architecture choices
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants