deprecate arrow.continuation #2672
Conversation
| @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ | |||
| package arrow.core.generic | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should this be under generic 🤔 Perhaps we should put it under continuation?
It's not really an arrow.core type, but it's required for the continuation runtime.
I think it's useful enough to expose since I've been using it already in some downstream MPP projects.
It's something I really miss in MPP projects and is not easily available in Kotlin since atomic-fu is not stable yet and still has some issues to be used in libraries.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, agree we can put this under arrow.generic. Maybe even create a small micro lib just with this descriptor, bc it can live without the overhead of arrow.core. What do you think? I am good with both options
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I just remembered that arrow.generic is a dedicated package for generic programming in the incubator, so should we keep it under arrow.core.continuation @nomisRev ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, let's just keep it in arrow.core.continuation. We can always push it down into another dependency if we really need to later without making a binary breaking change.
No description provided.