Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Option to add a separator between invocations for local server option #243

Open
tfrancois opened this issue Jan 22, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@tfrancois
Copy link

tfrancois commented Jan 22, 2024

Hi, my application does extensive logging to console/output and it is extremely hard to follow separate invocations/executions because there is no way to separate requests when running lambda-local using the HTTP server option. Although I have my own spacing once each invocation starts, if there was a way to optionally add a separator between each invocation that would make it better for readability and to search for and/or parse individual request IDs more easily.

CURRENT:

info: START RequestId: <<GUID>>
...
info: END - Result:
info: <<response>>
info: START RequestId: <<GUID>>
...
info: END - Result:
info: <<response>>
info: START RequestId: <<GUID>>
...
info: END - Result:
info: <<response>>

PROPOSED (with optional dashed line - or any other custom separator)

info: START RequestId: <<GUID>>
...
info: END - Result:
info: <<response>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
info: START RequestId: <<GUID>>
...
info: END - Result:
info: <<response>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
info: START RequestId: <<GUID>>
...
info: END - Result:
info: <<response>>

Thanks in advance for any consideration.

@tfrancois tfrancois changed the title Feature Request: Option to add a separator between invocations Feature Request: Option to add a separator between invocations for local server option Jan 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant