Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Compatible Loop #101

Open
seb86 opened this issue Dec 13, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

Compatible Loop #101

seb86 opened this issue Dec 13, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@seb86
Copy link
Collaborator

seb86 commented Dec 13, 2017

A new feature that will allow users who do not have technical knowledge for PHP to enable a compatible loop so content loads out of the box for them should the theme require support.

This still can be overridden should a theme have the template copied to their theme directory, but by providing this feature, users who do not have time to customize or know how to can simply enable a secondary form of support.

A setting will be added to allow the user to choose. Should it be enabled the standard template will not be used and a function will be called to load a compatible loop which cannot be edited.

The compatible loop does not require looking up template parts it simply loads the post content, metadata and comments if any.

Reference

@seb86
Copy link
Collaborator Author

seb86 commented Jan 10, 2018

This may still cause issues with certain frameworks like Genesis. Will have to do more research.

@seb86
Copy link
Collaborator Author

seb86 commented Sep 19, 2018

Genesis Framework has been supported as a plugin. A standard loop should do fine.

@seb86
Copy link
Collaborator Author

seb86 commented Apr 15, 2019

Working on a solution that does not require a user option and to load a fallback should the content templates not exist within the theme. The repeater template can still be overridden including all current template filters.

@seb86 seb86 added this to the v1.6 milestone May 17, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant