Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove dead projects #405

Open
G2G2G2G opened this issue Oct 1, 2022 · 18 comments
Open

Remove dead projects #405

G2G2G2G opened this issue Oct 1, 2022 · 18 comments

Comments

@G2G2G2G
Copy link
Contributor

G2G2G2G commented Oct 1, 2022

is this removing projects that are dead, like RDPwrap? it never really worked correctly in the first place either

atom text editor is also dead, the team moved to a different text editor called zed https://zed.dev/

@nodiscc
Copy link
Collaborator

nodiscc commented Oct 6, 2022

is this removing projects that are dead?

Now it is, officially https://github.com/awesome-foss/awesome-sysadmin/blob/master/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md

Any software project you are adding to the list is actively maintained.

Anyone, feel free to send Pull Requests to remove projects that are no longer maintained.

Thanks

@G2G2G2G

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodiscc

This comment was marked as outdated.

@G2G2G2G G2G2G2G closed this as completed Oct 7, 2022
@nodiscc

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodiscc nodiscc reopened this Oct 9, 2022
@nodiscc nodiscc pinned this issue Oct 9, 2022
@cu

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodiscc
Copy link
Collaborator

nodiscc commented Dec 15, 2022

The repo for LightTable went read-only a year ago and the last release was about 7 years ago. I presume that counts as dead?

It does. PR welcome.

It looks like Pulsar is an actively maintained community fork of Atom.

Ideally we should only list a single fork, unless there are significant differences between Atom-community and Pulsar.

I don't use it

Ideally when submitting a new tool, you should have been using it for some time and have good experiences with it. The tool should also be mature and stable enough. See also #357 for discussion on possible quality guidelines.

Judging by the first PR submitted in the Pulsar repo, this fork is only 4 months old, so I'd say it's not mature enough. Please read the comments at #357 and let us know your opinions there, if you have any.

@ColonelThirtyTwo

This comment was marked as outdated.

@ColonelThirtyTwo

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodiscc

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodiscc

This comment was marked as outdated.

nodiscc added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 17, 2023
nodiscc added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 17, 2023
- ref. #405
- Bolo's homepage is a default nginx page. I found https://github.com/huntprod/bolo which looks like the source code, but hasn't had a commit since 2018.
@nodiscc nodiscc changed the title dead projects Remove dead projects Jan 17, 2023
nodiscc added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 20, 2023
- ref. #405
- Bolo's homepage is a default nginx page. I found https://github.com/huntprod/bolo which looks like the source code, but hasn't had a commit since 2018.
@MBadberg

This comment was marked as outdated.

@G2G2G2G

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodiscc

This comment was marked as outdated.

@G2G2G2G

This comment was marked as outdated.

@Rabenherz112
Copy link
Contributor

We should check whether these URLs are still valid, and if needed, update them or remove these projects from the list.

Done with the latest PRs (#529, #530, #531, #532, #533)

I suggest 6 months for warning, 12 months for error for the last commit date

I would agree with this.

@animeai
Copy link

animeai commented Nov 3, 2023

VestaCP is pretty much abandoned at this point and should probably be replaced with the active (and much improved) fork HestiaCP https://github.com/hestiacp/hestiacp/ I don't have time to make a PR right now though!

@nodiscc
Copy link
Collaborator

nodiscc commented Nov 3, 2023

HestiaCP added in #515, VestaCP removed in #539. Thanks

nodiscc added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 30, 2023
- ref. #405
-  This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 2, 2023. It is now read-only.
nodiscc added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 30, 2023
- ref. #405
-  This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 2, 2023. It is now read-only.
nodiscc added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 30, 2023
-  This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 9, 2021. It is now read-only.
- ref. #405
nodiscc added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 30, 2023
-  This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 9, 2021. It is now read-only.
- ref. #405
nodiscc added a commit that referenced this issue May 20, 2024
nodiscc added a commit that referenced this issue May 20, 2024
nodiscc added a commit that referenced this issue May 20, 2024
nodiscc added a commit that referenced this issue May 21, 2024
nodiscc added a commit that referenced this issue May 21, 2024
nodiscc added a commit that referenced this issue May 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants