-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.1k
feat(route53): fromPublicHostedZoneAttributes method with zoneName #19771
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Conditional approval on adding the README changes.
Wasn't expecting an approval so fast haha, was gonna add that soon! I also want to add testing for this, but I'm not sure what the best way to test this is - the other import methods aren't tested. If they were, we'd need to either test it in Will that as simple as just adding the dependency to the package.json file in the respective package? I tried that at first but ran into some weird errors about not being able to export Cfn properties |
@comcalvi in case this doesn't end up in your queue otherwise 😛 |
Yep, you should be able to add |
Added testing in |
1 similar comment
Added testing in |
... don't look at what the title used to be 🤦🏻 |
@comcalvi can you take a quick look at this at some point to make sure it's all good with the recent additions? I don't want to just remove the label and let this go through without you taking another look. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks almost perfect, but can you add one test that verifies the behavior of fromPublicHostedZoneId()
? I know that method already existed, but we should have had tests for it before.
Added one @comcalvi 👍🏻 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great!
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from master and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from master and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
…ws#19771) fixes aws#18700 ---- ### All Submissions: * [ ] Have you followed the guidelines in our [Contributing guide?](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) ### Adding new Unconventional Dependencies: * [ ] This PR adds new unconventional dependencies following the process described [here](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md/#adding-new-unconventional-dependencies) ### New Features * [ ] Have you added the new feature to an [integration test](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/master/INTEGRATION_TESTS.md)? * [ ] Did you use `cdk-integ` to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e. `cdk-integ` without `--dry-run`)? *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
fixes #18700
All Submissions:
Adding new Unconventional Dependencies:
New Features
cdk-integ
to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e.cdk-integ
without--dry-run
)?By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license