The better trim() polyfill. #4072
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
caugner
approved these changes
Oct 6, 2021
|
Thanks this looks great |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
According to the document of String.prototype.trim() on mdn, trim() not only deals with
\sbut also\s\uFEFF\xA0. This is the better polyfill of trim().Notice on the newest page of String.prototype.trim(), the polyfill part is removed because it was so outdated. The last browser that needs polyfill was WebView Android 37, which was released 7 years ago. See mdn/content#7602
Also I know axios why keeps a polyfill version of trim()(See this) and also know about #3980 , but it can be done better.