Fix printer for explicitly inexact Flow types

[mrtnzlml]

Closes: #10040 🎉

Q	A
Fixed Issues?	Fixes #10040
Patch: Bug Fix?	Yes
Major: Breaking Change?	No
Minor: New Feature?	No
Tests Added + Pass?	Yes
Documentation PR Link
Any Dependency Changes?	No
License	MIT

[nicolo-ribaudo]

Could you also add a test when the compact: true option is enabled?

[mrtnzlml]

@nicolo-ribaudo Added. Is this the right way how to do it?

[mrtnzlml]

Also, CI failed but doesn't seem to be related (?). It's green when I run locally. Travis seems to be happy as well.

[existentialism]

@mrtnzlml restarted it

[nicolo-ribaudo]

Yes 👍 I asked for that test because when printing objects we indent, dedent, indent and dedent again.

[existentialism]

👍 nice work @mrtnzlml!

[mrtnzlml]

I asked for that test because when printing objects we indent, dedent, indent and dedent again.

🤔 I see, is there a way how to avoid my manual indent/dedent?

[babel-bot]

Build successful! You can test your changes in the REPL here: https://babeljs.io/repl/build/10891/

[nicolo-ribaudo]

It is possible to pass an option to printJoin to avoid indenting there, and only indent ad the start and at the end of ObjectTypeAnnotation. Anyway, since .indent() only does something like this.indentLevel++, it's fine as-is.

I'm merging this PR, thank you 😄

[mrtnzlml]

@nicolo-ribaudo Hi, when can we expect this to be released? Seems like it's still not and I just faced this bug again today.