Perform NamedEvaluation of Anonymous Functions in Logical Assignment #11658
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is a partial revert of babel#11370, updating the tests to match the [new consensus](babel/proposals#66 (comment)).
|
This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox. To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA. Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit f62ed55:
|
|
Build successful! You can test your changes in the REPL here: https://babeljs.io/repl/build/23357/ |
JLHwung
approved these changes
Jun 2, 2020
existentialism
added
the
PR: Spec Compliance 👓
existentialism
approved these changes
Jun 2, 2020
|
I'm glad to see that Babel's implementation helped finding this spec change 😄 |
|
I had to edit the commit name because it was too long |
github-actions
bot
added
the
outdated
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a partial revert of #11370, updating the tests to match the new consensus.
I want to thank @arku for the initial PR!