Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

babel-traverse: prefer clearer, reduced-bias option naming #11791

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jul 29, 2020
Merged

babel-traverse: prefer clearer, reduced-bias option naming #11791

merged 3 commits into from Jul 29, 2020

Conversation

jayaddison
Copy link
Contributor

@jayaddison jayaddison commented Jul 4, 2020

Q                       A
Patch: Bug Fix? No
Major: Breaking Change? Yes
Minor: New Feature? No
Tests Added + Pass? No
Documentation PR Link This babel-traverse option appears undocumented currently
Any Dependency Changes? No
License MIT

This proposed change attempts to clarify the naming of a babel-traverse option (noticed during development of #11790) by using language that aims to be clearer for non-native English speakers and has reduced modern connotations of bias.

Since the option doesn't appear to be widely used (ref) and doesn't appear to be documented(ref, ref), this changeset doesn't attempt to maintain backwards compatibility, although a release note to indicate that it is a breaking change would be useful.

@codesandbox-ci
Copy link

codesandbox-ci bot commented Jul 4, 2020

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit 9dc946d:

Sandbox Source
babel-repl-custom-plugin Configuration

@babel-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

babel-bot commented Jul 4, 2020

Build successful! You can test your changes in the REPL here: https://babeljs.io/repl/build/25413/

Co-authored-by: Nicolò Ribaudo <nicolo.ribaudo@gmail.com>
@nicolo-ribaudo nicolo-ribaudo added the PR: Internal 🏠 A type of pull request used for our changelog categories label Jul 5, 2020
Copy link
Member

@kaicataldo kaicataldo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Copy link
Contributor

@JLHwung JLHwung left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks.

@JLHwung JLHwung added PR: Polish 💅 A type of pull request used for our changelog categories and removed PR: Internal 🏠 A type of pull request used for our changelog categories labels Jul 6, 2020
@JLHwung JLHwung added this to the 7.11.0 milestone Jul 6, 2020
@JLHwung JLHwung added the PR: Ready to be Merged A pull request with already two approvals, but waiting for the next minor release label Jul 6, 2020
@JLHwung JLHwung merged commit 9daa50e into babel:main Jul 29, 2020
@jayaddison jayaddison deleted the language/prefer-reduced-bias-terminology branch October 14, 2020 19:23
@github-actions github-actions bot added the outdated A closed issue/PR that is archived due to age. Recommended to make a new issue label Jan 14, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 14, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
outdated A closed issue/PR that is archived due to age. Recommended to make a new issue pkg: traverse PR: Polish 💅 A type of pull request used for our changelog categories PR: Ready to be Merged A pull request with already two approvals, but waiting for the next minor release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants