Bump some deps for audit #11818
Merged
Bump some deps for audit #11818
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
existentialism
added
the
PR: Internal 🏠
|
This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox. To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA. Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit 7764d6a:
|
existentialism
force-pushed
the
audit-deps
branch
from
4f908cd
to
7764d6a
Compare
|
Build successful! You can test your changes in the REPL here: https://babeljs.io/repl/build/25786/ |
JLHwung
approved these changes
Jul 10, 2020
nicolo-ribaudo
approved these changes
Jul 10, 2020
1 task
github-actions
bot
added
the
outdated
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This bumps lodash and some transitive deps to get us back down to basically just the dastardly
rollup-plugin-node-builtinsrelated dpes on the audit report.The
lodashbump might be moot due to #11789 (depending on how we feel about per-function modules being removed in 5.x), but figured it didn't hurt in the meantime.