[bug] [safari] Causes a let declaration Syntax Error in Safari.

[trusktr]

Oddly, this error doesn't happen in Chrome, only in Safari.

Input Code

Here's the non-minified code:

https://cdn.rawgit.com/trusktr/3248affba4a01a7ebf15f3cb0e68f18c/raw/b6b8258ced55798113d852c5b457f0df3bd033c5/not-minified.js

Actual Output

Here's the minified code:

https://cdn.rawgit.com/trusktr/3248affba4a01a7ebf15f3cb0e68f18c/raw/b6b8258ced55798113d852c5b457f0df3bd033c5/minified.js

Expected Output

It should work, not sure what the output should be. Here's the gist containing both files: https://gist.github.com/trusktr/3248affba4a01a7ebf15f3cb0e68f18c

Details

The following codepen uses the non-minified version. It works in Safari, you'll see a spinning square:
https://codepen.io/anon/pen/rzQmpK?editors=0010

The following pen is exactly the same, but it is using the minified version:
https://codepen.io/anon/pen/EvOmJM?editors=0010

In Safari, you will see errors with the minified version, that look like this:

If you run both of those pens in Chrome, they work fine. Only the non-minified pen works in Safari.

[trusktr]

Additionally, you can reproduce by simply pasting the minified code in your Safari console.

[trusktr]

I'm currently on node-minify 2.3.0 (I'm using very recent versions of Rollup and rollup-plugin-babili to make these files, and I see node-minify in my node_modules).

[vigneshshanmugam]

We have hit this bug before and had a workaround which fixes this issue on safari #567. The fix has been released as part of 0.1.3

Also i see that your code contains both var and let declarations and I am not sure whether that is causing the issue. Could you tell me how you are using this?

[trusktr]

All vars (except for some vars I use used in the top level of modules for module export hoisting) are either from other node_modules or from build output during my Rollup+Buble transpile/bundle step.

Basically, what I am doing is npm run build-global in http://GitHub.com/trusktr/infamous which basically does (with Rollup+Buble) what is configured in rollup.config.js.

[trusktr]

This outputs the global.js file you see in that repo. If you comment out the lines that use babili you can disable minification.

[trusktr]

As a quickfix, I can just set the target to ie:10 and the Safari is able to run the code with no errors.

This is the minified code targetting ie10:
https://cdn.rawgit.com/trusktr/3248affba4a01a7ebf15f3cb0e68f18c/raw/09ee1b15b982ab1048a8efaff857149396adf7fc/minified-target-ie10.js

And here's a pen with minified code now working in Safari:
https://codepen.io/anon/pen/EvOpNq?editors=0010

I've just gotta run my tests to make sure nothing broke due to variable shadowing, but I bet Buble probably handled this.

[Oliboy50]

I'm using babel-preset-minify version 0.2.0 and the bug still occurs on Mac OS El Capitan - Safari 10.1.1 and on iOS 10.3.3 - Safari.

So the fix mentioned by @vigneshshanmugam in 0.1.3 does not seem to fix it.

Here is my error message :

SyntaxError: Cannot declare a const variable twice: 'd'.

(if you want to see my code, here you go => https://github.com/LinkValue/Appbuild/blob/master/webpack.config.js#L137)

As a workaround, i've set mangle: false in babel-preset-minify options... and it works, but it obviously makes my files bigger.

[boopathi]

@trusktr @Oliboy50

Can you give a minimal repro version of your code?

[marmanold]

I'm experiencing this issue, too.

[feuerste]

I have this issue, too. It seems to appear when mangling following file:
https://github.com/Polymer/polymer/blob/master/lib/mixins/property-accessors.html

[JakeDluhy]

I have run into this as well. Here's one example of the code that looks like it would cause problems: (my error is SyntaxError: Cannot declare a let variable twice: 'n'.)

var n = c(e.coordinates),
    i = fl(n, 3);
const s = i[0],
    o = i[2];
var l = c(t.coordinates),
    d = fl(l, 3);
const p = d[0],
    m = d[2],
    u = [_l(s, p, 0.1), e.height, _l(o, m, 0.1)],
    E = [_l(s, p, 0.9), t.height, _l(o, m, 0.9)],
    g = new yl.Y(E[2] - u[2], 0, u[0] - E[0]).normalize(),
    f = [],
    y = [],
    h = Array(...[, , , , , ]).map(() => []);
for (let n = 0; n <= Tl; n++) {
    var v = r(n / xl),
        T = fl(v, 3);
    const e = T[0],
        t = T[1],
        a = T[2];
    f.push(new yl.Y(e + g.x * vl, t, a + g.z * vl), new yl.Y(e - g.x * vl, t, a - g.z * vl)), h.forEach((e, t) => {
        var a = r(n / xl * ((t + 1) / Sl)),
            i = fl(a, 3);
        const s = i[0],
            o = i[1],
            l = i[2];
        e.push(new yl.Y(s + g.x * vl, o, l + g.z * vl), new yl.Y(s - g.x * vl, o, l - g.z * vl))
    })
}
for (let n = 0; n < bl; n++) {
    const e = (n + Tl) / xl,
        t = 2 * vl * (1 - n / bl);
    var b = r(e),
        S = fl(b, 3);
    const a = S[0],
        i = S[1],
        s = S[2];
    f.push(new yl.Y(a + g.x * t, i, s + g.z * t), new yl.Y(a - g.x * t, i, s - g.z * t)), h.forEach((a, n) => {
        var i = r(e * ((n + 1) / Sl)),
            s = fl(i, 3);
        const o = s[0],
            l = s[1],
            d = s[2];
        a.push(new yl.Y(o + g.x * t, l, d + g.z * t), new yl.Y(o - g.x * t, l, d - g.z * t))
    })
}

unminified:

const [x1, , z1] = axialToTHREE(from.coordinates);
const [x2, , z2] = axialToTHREE(to.coordinates);

const start = [
  linear(x1, x2, 0.1),
  from.height,
  linear(z1, z2, 0.1),
];

const end = [
  linear(x1, x2, 0.9),
  to.height,
  linear(z1, z2, 0.9),
];

const norm = new Vector3(
  end[2] - start[2],
  0,
  start[0] - end[0],
).normalize();

function getCurvePt(t) {
  const toff = t - 0.5;
  const quad = (1 - (4 * (toff ** 2)));

  return [
    linear(start[0], end[0], t),
    toff <= 0 ? linear(start[1], HEIGHT, quad) : linear(end[1], HEIGHT, quad),
    linear(start[2], end[2], t),
  ];
}

const verts = [];
const indices = [];
const morphVerticeArrays = Array(...Array(NUM_MORPH_STEPS)).map(() => []);

for(let i = 0; i <= NUM_STRAIGHT; i++) {
  const [x, y, z] = getCurvePt(i / NUM_TOTAL);

  verts.push(
    new Vector3(x + (norm.x * HALF_WIDTH), y, z + (norm.z * HALF_WIDTH)),
    new Vector3(x - (norm.x * HALF_WIDTH), y, z - (norm.z * HALF_WIDTH)),
  );

  morphVerticeArrays.forEach((arr, idx) => {
    const [xm, ym, zm] = getCurvePt((i / NUM_TOTAL) * ((idx + 1) / NUM_MORPH_STEPS));

    arr.push(
      new Vector3(xm + (norm.x * HALF_WIDTH), ym, zm + (norm.z * HALF_WIDTH)),
      new Vector3(xm - (norm.x * HALF_WIDTH), ym, zm - (norm.z * HALF_WIDTH)),
    );
  });
}

for(let i = 0; i < NUM_DIAGONAL; i++) {
  const t = (i + NUM_STRAIGHT) / NUM_TOTAL;
  const width = (HALF_WIDTH * 2) * (1 - (i / NUM_DIAGONAL));

  const [x, y, z] = getCurvePt(t);

  verts.push(
    new Vector3(x + (norm.x * width), y, z + (norm.z * width)),
    new Vector3(x - (norm.x * width), y, z - (norm.z * width)),
  );

  morphVerticeArrays.forEach((arr, idx) => {
    const [xm, ym, zm] = getCurvePt(t * ((idx + 1) / NUM_MORPH_STEPS));

    arr.push(
      new Vector3(xm + (norm.x * width), ym, zm + (norm.z * width)),
      new Vector3(xm - (norm.x * width), ym, zm - (norm.z * width)),
    );
  });
}

I also believe this would cause a problem too:

function n(e, t, a) {
    const n = new fi.p(e, t, a);
    r(n, [l[e], l[t], l[a]]), i.push(n)
}
const s = t / e,
    l = [],
    i = [];
l.push(new fi.Y(0, a({
    i: 0,
    j: 0,
    z: 0,
    x: 0
}), 0));
for (let n = 1; n <= e; n++) {
    const e = 6 * o(n),
        t = 6 * o(n - 1),
        r = e - t;
    for (let e = 1; e <= r; e++) {
        let o,
            d;
        const p = (e - 1) % n;
        if (0 == p) {
            const t = (e - 1) * (2 * ot / r);
            o = s * n * lt(t), d = s * n * st(t)
        } else {
            const t = it((e - 1) / n) * (ot / 3),
                a = Math.ceil((e - 1) / n) * (ot / 3);
            o = s * n * ((lt(a) - lt(t)) * (p / n) + lt(t)), d = s * n * ((st(a) - st(t)) * (p / n) + st(t))
        }
        l.push(new fi.Y(d, a({
            i: n,
            j: t + e,
            z: o,
            x: d
        }), o))
    }
}
for (let s = 1; s <= e; s++) {
    const t = 6 * o(s),
        a = 6 * o(s - 1),
        r = t - a;
    let i = 0;
    for (let l = 1; l <= r; l++) {
        let d;
        1 === s ? d = 0 : (d = 6 * o(s - 2) + (l - i), d = d > a ? 6 * o(s - 2) + 1 : d), n(a + l, a + (l % r + 1), d), s !== e && n(a + l, t + l + 1 + i, a + (l % r + 1)), 0 == l % s && i++
    }
}
const d = new fi.u;
return d.vertices = l, d.faces = i, d.computeFaceNormals(), d

I hope this helps!

[LinusU]

This is a bug in Safari 10.x:

https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171041

Uglify is working around the bug:

mishoo/UglifyJS#1753

Would be very nice if we could do the same here, this is currently affecting me in production 😱

Here is the commit that added the workaround to Uglify:

mishoo/UglifyJS@fcd90db