Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backend traits for Persistence layer #189

Open
vertexclique opened this issue Mar 25, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Backend traits for Persistence layer #189

vertexclique opened this issue Mar 25, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
A-state Area: State backend C-feature-request Category: Feature Request enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@vertexclique
Copy link
Member

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I want to store the state of the current mailbox and restore it when I need it.

Describe the solution you'd like
The persistence layer should have traits and also impl of possible external storage systems like rocksdb.

Describe alternatives you've considered

@vertexclique
Copy link
Member Author

vertexclique commented Jul 19, 2020

This is linked to #214 , if typed structs are passed as a handler. This will enable storing data in these structures with user's will. If that's not a feasible solution, we might need to seek for other alternatives for storing state individually for actors. But I think that will solve the problem.

cc @o0Ignition0o

@vertexclique vertexclique added A-state Area: State backend C-feature-request Category: Feature Request enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Jul 19, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-state Area: State backend C-feature-request Category: Feature Request enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant