You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I'm an author and maintainer of https://github.com/drevops/bats-helpers library. It is a feature-rich and constantly maintained library of BATS helpers and assertions. It has own tests with 90%+ coverage and documentation site (https://bats-helpers.drevops.com/). It is used on several OSS and non-OSS projects.
I'd like to have it added to the list of the libraries in the docs, so that the community could use it.
Thanks for your work in the Bats ecosystem! I am unsure how to proceed since we have no clear cut 3rd party policy yet.
My gut feeling tells me that promoting a 3rd party library in the official documentation would give it the semblance of being vetted/approved by the bats-core maintainers. I don't think there is enough capacity on our end to do that right now.
Nevertheless, I see merit in providing a central place to discover projects and tooling around Bats (aka an "Awesome Bats" list?). Maybe we can do something similar to the Projects Using Bats wiki page, which is community maintained?
An entry could look something like this:
bats-assert : Assertions for output and exit codes
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I'm an author and maintainer of https://github.com/drevops/bats-helpers library. It is a feature-rich and constantly maintained library of BATS helpers and assertions. It has own tests with 90%+ coverage and documentation site (https://bats-helpers.drevops.com/). It is used on several OSS and non-OSS projects.
I'd like to have it added to the list of the libraries in the docs, so that the community could use it.
Describe the solution you'd like
Add the library reference to the https://github.com/bats-core/bats-core/blob/master/docs/source/writing-tests.md page
Describe alternatives you've considered
N/A
Additional context
N/A
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: