Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tables in the documentation are difficult to read #1772

Open
mclarke47 opened this issue Apr 3, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Tables in the documentation are difficult to read #1772

mclarke47 opened this issue Apr 3, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@mclarke47
Copy link

mclarke47 commented Apr 3, 2024

What version of gazelle are you using?

N/A

What version of rules_go are you using?

N/A

What version of Bazel are you using?

N/A

Does this issue reproduce with the latest releases of all the above?

N/A

What operating system and processor architecture are you using?

N/A

What did you do?

N/A

What did you expect to see?

Expected the tables in the documentation to be readable via github webpage

What did you see instead?

The tables in the documentation are currently unreadable in the rendered markdown, example:

https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel-gazelle?tab=readme-ov-file#bazel-rule

Screenshot 2024-04-03 at 11 08 05 AM
@mclarke47 mclarke47 changed the title Tables in the document are mangled Tables in the documentation are mangled Apr 3, 2024
@mclarke47 mclarke47 changed the title Tables in the documentation are mangled Tables in the documentation are difficult to read Apr 3, 2024
@fmeum
Copy link
Collaborator

fmeum commented Apr 4, 2024

I checked git blame and this table's content hasn't changed in two years. Either it's been broken forever or something about GitHub's .rst rendering changed.

@klandergren
Copy link

or something about GitHub's .rst rendering changed.

It appears to be the case: https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/86715

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants