[patch] order/TypeScript: ignore ordering of object imports

[manuth]

Forcing object-imports to be alphabetized might lead to issues as they might depend on each other.

Example:

import { ESLint } from "eslint";
// Object-imports
import A = ESLint;
import OutputFixes = A.outputFixes;

OutputFixes([]);

Currently, this piece of code will report an error because A.LintResult has a lower rank than ESLint.
Alphabetizing these imports would cause this code to fail:

import { ESLint } from "eslint";
// Object-imports
import OutputFixes = A.outputFixes;
import A = ESLint;

OutputFixes([]);

Cannot read property 'outputFixes' of undefined

I see three different approaches to fix this:

• Sort object-imports with following conditions:
  1. Number of dots (e.g. ts comes before ts.protocol and ts.protocol comes before ts.protocol.Request)
  2. Import-Name
• Allow any sorting by setting names of all object-imports to ''
• Ignore object-imports

Though I'd like the first approach the most as it definitely would work and even would fix code like the one above, the second approach is ways easier to implement which is why I just went for it.

Remarks

The first approach won't work as, for example, this code still would cause an error:

import { ESLint } from "eslint";
import B = ESLint;
import A = B;

Therefore I'd recommend to go for the second approach as done in this PR.
Feedback is welcome - do you guys think it's possible to implement the first mentioned approach at some point?

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-7.9%) to 89.97% when pulling 2539870 on manuth:object-import-order into 4a38ef4 on benmosher:master.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-7.9%) to 89.97% when pulling 2539870 on manuth:object-import-order into 4a38ef4 on benmosher:master.

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+0.002%) to 97.855% when pulling c38b169 on manuth:object-import-order into bfc50b7 on benmosher:master.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-7.9%) to 89.97% when pulling 2539870 on manuth:object-import-order into 4a38ef4 on benmosher:master.

[manuth]

So I just realized that the first approach wouldn't work out as something like

import { ESLint } from "eslint";
import B = ESLint;
import A = B;

Still would cause issues.
Sticking up with the solution of this PR (which is naming all object-imports '') seems to be the best way to go.