New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Official release #1722
Comments
We still have a few "big" issues: https://github.com/orgs/bootstrap-vue-next/projects/1 And we're busy with real work and life, so not that much time to donate to open source. |
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
Prologue: I've seen many questions about the state of the lib and if they "should" use it in production. I can't really speak about whether or not someone should do it, but from experience, most features exist and people can usually use things without issue. Assuming the components one needs have not been neglected. Generally though, most components are in a ready-enough state to be usable. If various features or bugs are found, the author of the issue would probably find most utility in fixing the issue themselves. The official position on the road to v1: What I have been working on and need to do:
Now the list of things that I am not working on that need to be finished:
Once we have a parity list, the goal of that is to implement the missing functionality. (Note: not everything will be implemented, we just need it documented about what is not going to be implemented). Finally, after implementing the missing functionality, the documentation needs to be updated and fixed. Information #1778 Naturally, in combination with the parity list, a migration guide needs to be created using the data from the parity list Note: finalization of any of the final steps (implementing parity features & documentation) is not a blocking value. These final steps can be labelled as a release candidate version |
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
If you are asking me, I cannot make that decision. If I could make that decision, v1 would have been announced. And when I can make this decision, v1 will be announced. However, I find most people find that things are functional and work without much issue. Really, the biggest blocker on v1 is #1775 . It is a necessity for 1: addressing which things have not been implemented and what needs to be done and 2: creating a migration guide. But, given that, we can see the finish line. |
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
I'd say that the lib is in a "release candidate" version. The remaining issues are mostly compatibility fixes |
Edit (from @VividLemon): Review #1722 (comment) for official release information
Hi, everyone.
Do you know when we could have an oficial release? I mean the version 1.X
I cannot see anything about this on the Projects tab
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: