Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Additional parameter for QEMU Agent checking #1248

Open
marton-gombocz opened this issue Apr 30, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Additional parameter for QEMU Agent checking #1248

marton-gombocz opened this issue Apr 30, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
⌛ pending author's response Requested additional information from the reporter ✨ enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@marton-gombocz
Copy link

The problem is that if I enable guest agent checking and somehow the agent is not running on a machine, then the whole automation fails. We're operating with around 200 machines and we have an automation that creates new machines. If the agent is turned off in an instance then the whole automation crashes.
Best solution would be an additional ignore_errors variable that lets the process to continue if some of the machine is unresponsive.
Thanks in advance!
BR,
Márton

@marton-gombocz marton-gombocz added the ✨ enhancement New feature or request label Apr 30, 2024
@bpg
Copy link
Owner

bpg commented May 23, 2024

Hi @marton-gombocz! 👋🏼

Before deciding on this ticket, I'd like to know a bit more about your error cases:

The problem is that if I enable guest agent checking and somehow the agent is not running on a machine, then the whole automation fails. We're operating with around 200 machines and we have an automation that creates new machines. If the agent is turned off in an instance then the whole automation crashes.

How does it fail? How does it crash?

Just thinking aloud, if you don't need the QEMU Agent functionality, then don't enable it. If provisioning does not work with the agent disabled, then it depends on the agent functionality, and ignoring agent errors in this case won't do any good either.
But anyway, it's hard to make any decision without full understanding of the use case and seeing those errors messages / debug logs.

@bpg bpg added the ⌛ pending author's response Requested additional information from the reporter label May 23, 2024
@marton-gombocz
Copy link
Author

Hi @bpg!
Thanks for your response!
Me and my colleagues will try to gather as much logs as we can, we just need some time and we'll come back to you.
BR,
Márton

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
⌛ pending author's response Requested additional information from the reporter ✨ enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants