Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Select target instead of connection when connecting #2142

Open
philippfromme opened this issue Apr 17, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Select target instead of connection when connecting #2142

philippfromme opened this issue Apr 17, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
@marstamm
Labels
backlog Queued in backlog enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers needs discussion Needs further discussion spring cleaning Could be cleaned up one day

Comments

@philippfromme
Copy link
Contributor

philippfromme commented Apr 17, 2024 •
edited

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

When connecting two shapes the new connection will be selected afterwards. We should reconsider whether it would be
better for the flow to select the target instead.

brave_u42V1NjOSF

Describe the solution you'd like

Select target after connect.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Keeping the existing behavior.

Additional context

Slack thread: https://camunda.slack.com/archives/C0693F1NFK5/p1713361255849419
@philippfromme philippfromme added enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers spring cleaning Could be cleaned up one day labels Apr 17, 2024
@barmac
Copy link
Member

barmac commented Apr 18, 2024

I think it makes sense!

@barmac barmac added the backlog Queued in backlog label Apr 18, 2024
@nikku
Copy link
Member

nikku commented Apr 18, 2024

This could improve modeling flow but conflicts with "upgrading the connection once added", cf. below:

capture hfLpWi_optimized

@marstamm marstamm self-assigned this Apr 29, 2024
@marstamm marstamm added the needs discussion Needs further discussion label Apr 29, 2024
@nikku
Copy link
Member

nikku commented May 14, 2024

Once we get to this issue, let's consider if we can test what the expected behavior is.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@marstamm marstamm

Labels
backlog Queued in backlog enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers needs discussion Needs further discussion spring cleaning Could be cleaned up one day
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@nikku @philippfromme @marstamm @barmac