Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mining blocks more than specified #4293

Open
bulieme opened this issue Mar 11, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Mining blocks more than specified #4293

bulieme opened this issue Mar 11, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@bulieme
Copy link

bulieme commented Mar 11, 2024

mine diamond_ore iron_ore to mine diamond ore or iron ore (turn on the setting legitMine to only mine ores that it can actually see. It will explore randomly around y=11 until it finds them.) An amount of blocks can also be specified, for example, mine 64 diamond_ore.

I tried that in readme.md, but the baritone is mining more than 64 specified blocks. anyone know why?

@ZacSharp ZacSharp added the question Further information is requested label Mar 11, 2024
@ZacSharp
Copy link
Collaborator

Someone already reported this in #4228. As you can see there, nobody explained why it happens and there is no known fix.
Last time I tried it did stop after the specified amount of items, but maybe I just tried the wrong block. I suspect it's because the actual drops are not what Baritone thinks they should be. Are you perhaps using silk touch?

@bulieme
Copy link
Author

bulieme commented Mar 14, 2024

i did not use silk touch

@bulieme
Copy link
Author

bulieme commented Mar 14, 2024

maybe yea i think the baritone thinks the item must be the same as it specified

@bulieme
Copy link
Author

bulieme commented Mar 20, 2024

UPDATE: I tried oak_log (winch is the same item when dropped) and still wont work

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants