Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make BLS impl compatible with IRTF doc #21

Open
LLFourn opened this issue May 10, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Make BLS impl compatible with IRTF doc #21

LLFourn opened this issue May 10, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@LLFourn
Copy link
Collaborator

LLFourn commented May 10, 2023

irtf here: https://github.com/cfrg/draft-irtf-cfrg-bls-signature

I dunno what has to be done here. One decision we need to make is whether we want minimal-pubkey-size or minimal-signature-size. I think I implemented it with the minimal-pubkey-size variant. Otherwise I think the scheme I implemented is compatible with the irtf but we should check this with some test vectors. I don't think I even implemented verify yet.

Note i think we will need our own implementation rather than relying on 3rd party libraries since we will use the signatures is some non-black-box ways.

@LLFourn LLFourn changed the title Make BLS impl compatible with irtf Make BLS impl compatible with IRTF doc May 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant