You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I dunno what has to be done here. One decision we need to make is whether we want minimal-pubkey-size or minimal-signature-size. I think I implemented it with the minimal-pubkey-size variant. Otherwise I think the scheme I implemented is compatible with the irtf but we should check this with some test vectors. I don't think I even implemented verify yet.
Note i think we will need our own implementation rather than relying on 3rd party libraries since we will use the signatures is some non-black-box ways.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
LLFourn
changed the title
Make BLS impl compatible with irtf
Make BLS impl compatible with IRTF doc
May 10, 2023
irtf here: https://github.com/cfrg/draft-irtf-cfrg-bls-signature
I dunno what has to be done here. One decision we need to make is whether we want
minimal-pubkey-size
orminimal-signature-size
. I think I implemented it with theminimal-pubkey-size
variant. Otherwise I think the scheme I implemented is compatible with the irtf but we should check this with some test vectors. I don't think I even implementedverify
yet.Note i think we will need our own implementation rather than relying on 3rd party libraries since we will use the signatures is some non-black-box ways.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: